Reverse Mortgage Lending Limit to Rise in 2020

The lending limit for federally-backed reverse mortgages is increasing for the fourth consecutive year in a row and is set to rise to $765,600 in 2020.

The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) announced on Friday via Mortgagee Letter 2019-20 a maximum claim amount of $765,600 for calendar year 2020, up from $726,525 in 2019.

HUD calculates this figure at 150 percent of the conforming loan limits on mortgages to be acquired by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which was announced by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) last week to be $510,400 for calendar year 2020—up from $484,350 in 2019.


This rise marks a positive development for the reverse mortgage business, while also sending a message that widely-discussed regional lending limits will not be coming with the beginning of the new year, according to Reverse Market Insight (RMI) President John Lunde.

“It’s a decent increase for 2020 which is a positive development for additional volume,” said Lunde. “More importantly, they’re keeping the single national lending limit after there was public hinting about potentially reverting to county lending limits at some point. While the 2020 announcement doesn’t say that won’t ever happen, at least it’s not happening January 1, 2020.”

For several years, the reverse mortgage lending limit remained stagnant, before rising in 2017 from $625,500 to $636,150. Since then, a rise in the HECM lending limit has closely accompanied the announcement of conforming loan limits on Fannie and Freddie mortgages. The new loan limit will take effect for loans with case numbers assigned on or after January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020, as specified by HUD.

The release of the new HECM lending limits followed closely after the release of Mortgagee Letter 2019-19, which specified new forward mortgage loan limits, which divides the limits between low- and high-cost areas and property unit numbers. In low-cost areas, the limits range from $331,760 for one-unit and $638,100 for four-unit.

In high-cost areas, the limits start at $765,600 for one-unit to $1,472,550 for four-unit. In the same special exception areas, the limits start at $1,148,400 for one-unit and go to $2,208,825 for four-unit.

For more detailed information about the new limits, check out HUD’s Mortgagee Letter 2019-20 and its loan limits page.

Companies featured in this article:

, ,

Join the Conversation (2)

see all

This is a professional community. Please use discretion when posting a comment.

  • I do not think John Lunde has somehow overlooked that the proposed change in lending limits by location of the property was to have been a legislative initiated change, not an administrative one. Although it escapes me as to why legislation is needed to make the change after RMSA of 2013 went into effect. The RMSA of 2013 is codified in 12 USC 1715z-20(h)(3). Combining that provision with 12 USC 1715z-20(h), reads as follows:

    “(h)Administrative authority

    The Secretary may—

    (3)establish, by notice or mortgagee letter, any additional or alternative requirements that the Secretary, in the Secretary’s discretion, determines are necessary to improve the fiscal safety and soundness of the program authorized by this section, which requirements shall take effect upon issuance.”

    Since it seems clear that HUD Secretary Carson has reached the conclusion required under the law, it seems John Lunde’s conclusion has strong grounds even though HUD stated any change in this provision would come through legislation without explaining why.

    While opinions like that of John are useful, cluttering up this important topic with forward news that is somewhat repetitive in nature, when looking back at recent RMD articles, seems unnecessary. Here a separation of the two topics would have produced more clarity. With how much misinformation comes out of the industry at times, news that is solely HECM or reverse mortgage generally in nature should be encouraged to be reported separately from other mortgage news unless the topics are so intertwined that to do otherwise would distort the topic. The purpose of this portion of my comment is is not to discourage important news about the forward mortgage market. Here is news that should have been reported in two articles rather than in just one. Hopefully, this criticism will be received as intended, i.e., constructive.

string(91) ""

Share your opinion

[wpli_login_link redirect=""]