Reverse Mortgages Are Booming Worldwide, and the United States is Next

Across the globe, countries are facing an aging population that is unprepared to retire, and many governments are turning to reverse mortgages as an option to help fund longevity — the United States is no different.

With 10,000 baby boomers turning 65 each day for the foreseeable future, the United States needs to be a pioneer of the reverse mortgage product, and it has been.

The Department of Housing and Urban Development launched a demonstration program in 1987 and after a 10-year evaluation, the product became permanent in 1998. Through the years the program has seen its ups and downs.


In 2000, the industry originated 6,640 units, while volume hit record numbers in 2009 with 114,692 reverse mortgages being insured under the Home Equity Conversion Mortgage (HECM) program. Since then, things have been difficult.

During the Great Recession, the reverse mortgage industry was hit like all other financial services sectors, but it hasn’t recovered like most traditional lending products. During the fiscal year 2017, the industry endorsed 55,332 HECMs, and this year hasn’t been much better.

In June, the industry hit a low point by endorsing only 2,838 HECMs, a 13-year low according to Reverse Market Insight, a data analysis firm. The bleak numbers didn’t come as any huge surprise to most who live the business every day, but things could be about to change.

What’s preventing the industry from growing in the United States?

On the surface, figuring out why the industry hasn’t been growing seems simple. One could argue that the government has changed the product so many times, lowered the benefit to borrowers, and increased regulation so much that it’s no longer a viable solution.

It’s a fair argument to make, but one that I don’t agree with anymore.

As someone who studies the business of retirement and aging every day, there are a couple of things to point out.

Even after all the principal limit reductions, the Federal Housing Administration’s reverse mortgage is still the most competitive product in the world. There is no other reverse mortgage product that provides so much in proceeds with so many protections for the borrower and the heirs —not even close.

If you look at the Canadian market, the industry is booming. HomeEquity Bank, the leading provider in Canada, saw volume grow 40% with a product that provides far less in proceeds, protections, and benefits.

In Australia, the government sees the reverse mortgage as part of the solution to help older Aussies retire and age in place comfortably. In China, which has the world’s fastest-aging population and a pension system hit by shortfalls, the government announced it will start allowing reverse mortgages for seniors nationwide.

Imagine if the United States government started looking at reverse mortgages as part of a policy strategy going forward for a population that hasn’t saved for retirement.

According to data from the Federal Reserve’s regular Survey of Consumer Finances, the average household retirement savings for those aged 64 to 75 is only $358,400, with the median being $126,000. When you factor in that Fidelity estimates the average retired couple aged 65 and over in 2018 may need approximately $280,000 saved — after tax — to cover health care expenses in retirement, it is obvious there is a major problem coming for the United States.

There will need to be a public policy solution to this problem, and it’s hard to argue that reverse mortgages won’t be part of the solution going forward, as the government will need to help retirees tap their own assets during retirement.

Based on these factors, the reverse mortgage industry in the United States is poised to grow. It’s not a matter of if; it’s only a matter of when.

The Government’s Backing of Reverse Mortgages Going Forward

Despite volume for the government’s reverse mortgage product being at historic lows, there is a reason for optimism going forward. If there is one thing I’ve learned covering this industry over the last 13 years, it’s to never underestimate the importance of leadership at the Federal Housing Administration when it comes to reverse mortgages.

Current FHA commissioner Brian Montgomery has been a strong supporter of the program in both of his terms at the helm.

“I have been a strong advocate of the reverse mortgage program,” he said during a call with reporters last month. “This program allows seniors to age in place, which they want to do. It’s the best kind of program [in that it offers] assistance you pay for yourself…It’s up to us to fix it for the long term.”

There have been a lot of fixes over the years, with the reduction of principal limits being the lever pulled most often to help stem the losses from the program. Based on additional comments from Montgomery, it seems as those days might be over for now.

“If you make further changes to [principal limit factors], pricing changes, what is the tipping point to where volume drops, and there are impacts to the [HECM mortgage-backed securities],” he said. “I am very mindful of that, but looking at the back end of the process, once the loans are assigned to HUD is the area we are focused on. I am not sure further [principal limit] cuts are going to fix that problem.”

With the beginning of HUD’s fiscal year on October 1 rapidly approaching, we should know very soon what changes could be coming, and for the first time in a while, I’m optimistic.

The U.S. Model for Reverse Mortgages Going Forward

When the subprime crisis hit, the industry became acutely aware that there was a reputation problem, and it has been dealing with it ever since.

While it has been a painful transition, the industry has risen to meet the challenges and confront the reputation image issue in a thoughtful, strategic approach. Years ago, the National Reverse Mortgage Lenders Association and its members started to position the product as a retirement tool, and over the years that has been backed up by many in the financial planning industry.

Numerous academic journals have published research that shows reverse mortgages can be a key part of an overall retirement strategy and it’s hard to argue they shouldn’t be part of the discussion with so much information now available.

The way lenders are positioning themselves has also taken a dramatic change. In years past, it was thought that in order to be successful originating reverse mortgages, you had to go all in. If you offered traditional lending products, you would be distracted, and you had to have this unique knowledge of the product and borrower that required a sole focus on reverse mortgages. Those days seem to be over.

We are seeing industry leaders such as American Advisors Group, along with new players like Mutual of Omaha Bank through its acquisition of Retirement Funding Solutions, offer a suite of products to help older Americans age in place. This personalized approach to mortgage lending and financial planning is the future.

Going forward, I fully expect others to follow suit, and once there are more successful transitions, it’s only a matter of time before we see some of the larger banks and institutional investors get back into the business, following this model.

The industry is also no longer constrained by one product to help borrowers tap their home equity; they now have a small arsenal that includes the HECM, home equity loans, and private products.

With the changes implemented by the government to the HECM, the industry has been forced to work together to bring back the private market. Creating new products is no small task, and the industry should embrace these alternatives going forward as a means to carrying the concept of a reverse mortgage forward.

Despite the tough times many are experiencing, there is plenty of room for optimism in this industry. All the years of hard work to position reverse mortgages as a financial planning tool, diversify from a 100% government-backed product, and strengthen the health of the program are starting to bear fruit.

Never before have I seen the industry so well-organized behind its mission to be a solution to help a broader range of seniors tap their home equity to ensure a better retirement.

It’s a new approach and one that is bringing new life and interest to an industry full of opportunity. While it has taken a long time and a lot of hard work, all of the pieces of the puzzle seem to be putting the industry in a very exciting place — a position for growth going forward.

Written by John Yedinak

Editors note: a prior version of this article stated the incorrect volume for June 2018.

Join the Conversation (9)

see all

This is a professional community. Please use discretion when posting a comment.

  • John,

    Peter Bell ought to read your opinion as his opening remarks at this year’s NRMLA convention.

    Your remarks are not only a firm commitment to the industry as it reshapes but even more to HECM endorsement optimism. While some of us are not there yet, your arguments are both interesting and compelling. You will find us completely there when numbers begin to match up with rhetoric but this is one of those things that will grow with endorsement growth, once begin to see monthly endorsements of over 4,000 consistently for a period of 9 months or more.

    To be fair, the June 2018 endorsement total per HUD (maybe not RMI although I do not know that), the lowest in 13 years, was 2,828, not 2,355. You would have to go all the way back to January 2004 (over 14 years ago) to find a monthly endorsement total lower than that.

    But again quite a compelling article.

    • Carmine,

      Thanks for the note. I updated the article regarding the June 2018 volume, thanks for catching that.

      I know it can be hard to look past the last couple months of low volume, but I’m confident we will bounce back — it’s only a matter of time.

      We will be here to cover it with more people and announcements coming soon. Stay tuned.


  • I’ve always wondered why Social Security administration and Medicare and Medicaid have not been more welcoming of reverse mortgages as a tool to reduce the burden on their entitlement programs. Reverse mortgages seem a perfect partner to what they provide. Even AARP has turned a blind eye to the synergy HECMS can bring to the social services table.

  • I have been saying this right along! As many of you know, I have been continually optimistic that we will pull out of the slump we are in. I have felt there was to much going for us, despite FA and the October, 2017 ruling!

    In July and August we have seen a slight uptick, not a lot but it is going in the right direction!

    With all the new proprietary product changes occurring and the additional lenders getting into that market, that alone has caused rumble a focus on our industry.

    The surge in Baby boomers turning of age and the need for our seniors to utilize their equity in their homes for retirement purposes. All this leads to the potential rise in our markets again! Providing however, lenders take advantage of opportunities out there and not sit on their hands waiting for it to happen with out doing something to make it happen!

    It is up to you and I as well as the rest of us to make it happen and it will if we want it to!!

    John A. Smaldone

    • John,

      And what a slump it is. If the average years of actually working is 40 years now. Fiscal 2019 will be the celebration of the tenth year of this slump. For many that will very close to 25% of their working years.

      And can we trust that 2020 will be much better? Optimism changes nothing. In early 2013 several industry leaders said in anger that they did not come into this industry to do just 50,000 endorsements a year. They proclaimed that they driven to take us back to yesteryear. Five years later we are seeing two years of endorsements UNDER 50,000 endorsements.

      I really do not see how you can be quite so optimistic especially when the Extreme Summit was such a spectacular failure. So far we have had words of support from FHA leadership but where is the change that goes with those words? I do not know if you are originating but the interest of seniors is not what it was even a year ago. The Case Number Assignments are up one month and down the next even if we are seeing a slight over all rise. They are the true reflectors and indicators of demand.

string(114) ""

Share your opinion

[wpli_login_link redirect=""]