‘Victims of a Past System’: WaPo Looks at Reverse Mortgage Foreclosures

The Washington Post on Friday analyzed several stories of seniors facing reverse mortgage foreclosures, incorporating the voices of both Home Equity Conversion Mortgage supporters and those who have had problems with the products.

Citing a 2016 report from the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Post noted that 18% of reverse mortgages originated between 2009 to last June are projected to result in tax-and-insurance defaults; in addition, 90,000 had at least 12 months of unpaid property charges.

Though the Post article explains the introduction of Financial Assessment rules other updated protections for HECM borrowers, AARP attorney Joanne Savage notes that many of the issues stem from the pre-FA days, leading the Post to characterize people struggling with tax-and-insurance issues as “victims of a past system.”

Advertisement

“There needs to be a little more mercy,” Savage told the Post. “We are going to have a steady stream of these clients for five to 10 years.”

For instance, the Post profiles Washington, D.C. resident Virginia Rayford, a 92-year-old who took out a lump sum HECM of about $60,000 in 2008. She began having trouble paying her taxes in 2013, and currently owes Nationstar Mortgage about $6,000 in back charges, according to the Post.

The piece also quotes Leslie Flynne, a senior vice president at Reverse Mortgage Solutions, who notes that HUD-mandated deadlines for accelerating the default process sometimes leave servicers with few palatable options.

“You have people who have run out of money, they can’t pay their taxes, and they are awaiting a miracle,” Flynne told the Post.

Read the full piece at The Washington Post.

Written by Alex Spanko

Join the Conversation (1)

see all

This is a professional community. Please use discretion when posting a comment.

  • I feel very bad for so many of these seniors. Yes, we do need to try and show as much mercy as we can.

    However, we must face it, we as an industry never looked at the ability of the senior borrower to pay their property charges. In short, we created much of the Bed we made!

    Today we have FA, which takes into consideration of ones ability to pay for property charges, the borrower must meet certain residual income buffers. Also, we now look at credit and the willingness to pay debts on the part of the borrower.

    I see where we do bear much of the responsibility, many borrowers should not have been put into a HECM but were, unfortunately!

    John A. Smaldone
    http://www.hanover-financial.com

string(113) "https://reversemortgagedaily.com/2017/08/27/victims-of-a-past-system-wapo-looks-at-reverse-mortgage-foreclosures/"

Share your opinion