How the Reverse Mortgage Industry Can Adapt to Higher Interest Rates

NEW YORK — In a time of increasing interest rates, reverse mortgage brokers and lenders have a wide variety of options to thwart the potential negative effects — and potentially take advantage of certain benefits that arise as the federal funds rate rises.

Craig Barnes of Reverse Mortgage Funding on Tuesday presented a series of tips and tricks for brokers during a morning seminar at the National Reverse Mortgage Association’s eastern regional conference and exhibition, telling the crowd that despite rising interest rates, the Home Equity Conversion Mortgages remain “a great product.”

“You have different triggers that you can pull in order to make it an attractive offering to a potential borrower,” Barnes said.


The biggest impact that rising interest rates and general economic uncertainty have on reverse mortgages, Barnes said, is on margins, especially for borrowers that are looking to extract the greatest amount of equity from their homes: For instance, Barnes cited data showing that before the election, a HECM borrower could get maximum proceeds with a margin of 3.625%, but on November 15, that margin had dropped nearly a full point to 2.75%.

“After the election, markets became more volatile,” Barnes said.

And that was before the Federal Reserve increased the federal funds rate to a range of 0.75% to 1.0%, the first of three expected hikes before the end of the year as the Fed creeps toward its goal of 3.0% by the end of 2019.

When margins constrict, Barnes said, brokers can’t always provide the same kind of incentives to entice borrowers, such as credits toward closing costs or other potential carrots. As a result, he said it’s important to explain to clients exactly what they’re paying and why to assuage sticker shock, with a particular focus on the mortgage insurance premium.

“Everyone talks about non-recourse, everyone talks about how the home is really the source of repayment, how there’s no deficiency judgment on their heirs,” Barnes said. “We all know that. But for that peace of mind, that’s why we have MIP.”

He advised brokers to emphasize that borrowers can save on MIP costs by keeping their mandatory obligations under 60%.

Noting that many borrowers are still looking for the maximum proceeds possible from their HECMs, Barnes told the crowd to review rate sheets often to identify products that provide an expected interest rate at or below the magic number of 5.06% as the federal fund rate rises. He gave a quick example of a 72-year-old borrower with a maximum claim of $300,000. At an expected interest rate of 5.06%, that person would have a principal limit of $177,300,* but only $168,000 at a slightly higher rate of 5.25%.

“It’s not always the best product, but for the borrower that needs max proceeds, you’ve got to know how to get them there.”

If a potential borrower doesn’t need to draw the maximum possible amount of cash from his or her house, Barnes said, it might be better to point to an adjustable-rate product with higher margins, which would allow the unused line of credit to grow at a faster clip.

Finally, Barnes brought up a small but potentially effective way to lower origination costs: breaking out a separate serving set-aside. By subtracting the $30 to $35 per month servicing fee from the principal limit, Barnes said, lenders can sometimes pay originators a little bit more, and originators can in turn offer credits or reduced origination fees in kind.

“It’s just another tool in your toolbox as the margins change,” Barnes said.

*Editor’s note: a previous version of this article had an incorrect principal limit figure in this scenario. The principal limit calculation has been updated to the correct value. 

Written by Alex Spanko

Join the Conversation (2)

see all

This is a professional community. Please use discretion when posting a comment.

  • If seniors are a protected class, why do lender spokespeople like Craig state over and over again that it is FHA insurance premiums that make HECMs nonrecourse? If all reverse mortgage transactions are nonrecourse transactions as stated by federal law at 15 USC 1602(bb) and HUD in its Handbook 4235.1 clearly declares that HECMs are reverse mortgages, then how does FHA insurance come into play?

    It is the loan documents that declare that lenders cannot obtain a deficiency judgment against the borrower not a clause in any document solely between FHA and the borrower that suffices as an insurance contract. FHA insurance is simply a policy to reimburse the proper claims of lenders who might lose money on HECM notes. If borrowers are covered by FHA insurance where are their contracts? What happens if the reimbursement to the lender is insufficient to pay off the lender’s claim against FHA? Can the lenders get that unreimbursed portion of the claim from the borrower? If that is the case, a HECM is recourse at least to that extent but that conclusion is nonsense.

    What FHA insurance does is reimburse lenders for losses on the note and nothing more. But by doing that, it allows HECM lenders to offer terms of lower interest and higher proceeds than this otherwise very risky mortgage calls for.

    Yet because FHA MIP that lenders are required to pay are a cost to the lender for creating and maintaining the mortgage, lenders are permitted to pass these costs on to borrowers. So why the myth that it is FHA insurance that creates nonrecourse? Because it is an easy way to explain what is generally the second highest cost of these loans, ongoing MIP, and what is conspicuously charged at closing, the upfront MIP.

    Although borrowers are a protected class it seems that when it comes to explaining MIP costs, HECM lenders have adopted the philosophy of Roger Thornhill (Cary Grant) in North by Northwest: “In the world of advertising, there’s no such thing as a lie. There’s only expedient exaggeration.”

  • I find it interesting that we claim to EDUCATE and not sell, yet when worse comes to worse and we find a potential economic atmosphere where sales could drop, we have what is little more than a training session of all things titled in the post above as “tips and TRICKS.”

    Why was this session brought into the meetings? Again because sales are likely to fall unless seniors realize the value of a rising expected rate index when it comes to their line of credit. If tactics vary with economic conditions, then let us AT LEAST be true to ourselves and admit that we are selling using an educational methodology?

    Did the markets become volatile after the election? To have volatility, Google says the environment must be “liable to change rapidly and unpredictably, especially for the worse.” After the election, the markets were generally only going up until after the Inauguration when the President’s tweets were even more markedly getting in his own way.

    Yes, interest rates have been rising even before the Fed announcement about its newly proposed interest rate timetable. Some of that was market anticipation of the announcement thus making the impact a little softer landing than might otherwise be anticipated.

string(113) ""

Share your opinion

[wpli_login_link redirect=""]