Ever-Rising Home Prices May Not Boost Reverse Mortgage Market

Average single-family home prices in December 2016 were 7.2% higher than at the same point in 2015, according to a report released Tuesday by CoreLogic — but the gaudy percentage might not necessarily lead to immediate results for the reverse mortgage industry, which struggled in that same timespan.

“It’s always better for the industry to have more home equity value available to potential clients, but it takes a while for that to translate to loan volume,” said John K. Lunde, president of Reverse Market Insight, Inc., a Dana Point, Calif.-based research firm. 

The Pacific Northwest saw the greatest home-value gains during that period, with Oregon posting a 10.8% rise and Washington state seeing 10.3% growth, according to CoreLogic. Idaho, Colorado, and Florida rounded out the real estate analytics firm’s list of the top five year-over-year gainers for home prices. Of the 50 states and the District of Columbia, only Wyoming saw contraction with a decline of 0.3%.


Among metropolitan areas, Denver led the way with a 9.9% jump, followed by Boston at 6.9%; there was a tie for third place at 6.8% between the Los Angeles and Miami metro regions. 

December 2016 marked the 59th consecutive month of year-over-year single-family home price gains in the United States, despite industry worries over increased mortgage rates. The figure also represented the most significant annual increase since June 2014, when the percentage increase hit 5.0% and hovered there for about a year and a half.

CoreLogic’s analysts predict further home-price gains of 4.7% through December 2017, even with industry experts predicting higher mortgage rates during that span.

Reverse mortgage volume tends to thrive on high home equity levels when a greater number of borrowers can qualify. However, industry pressures could counter equity and price tailwinds, Lunde says. “[There’s still] the challenge of marketing the product at a reasonable cost to consumers that can qualify under the Financial Assessment rules.”

Written by Alex Spanko

Join the Conversation (3)

see all

This is a professional community. Please use discretion when posting a comment.

  • An interesting statement by Mr. Lunde. It would be even more interesting if he shared with us more of the details he is relying on to reach his conclusion that “…the challenge of marketing the product at a reasonable cost to consumers that can qualify under the Financial Assessment rules.”

  • As one of those who thought that the return of higher home values would blunt the downturn in endorsements, the heading of the post rings, oh, so true. While there may be some small correlation to home prices, increases in HECM endorsements do not seem to be as positively correlated to home price increases as they were in the fiscal years leading up to fiscal 2008.

    It is hard to find leading indicators that give us any reasonable idea of how the HECM market may do over the next five years. One trend that seems to be true is that we find ourselves in downward sloping stagnation based fiscal year endorsement totals. But even that may go away if fiscal 2017 ends up with less endorsements than fiscal 2016.

string(106) "https://reversemortgagedaily.com/2017/02/08/ever-rising-home-prices-may-not-boost-reverse-mortgage-market/"

Share your opinion

[wpli_login_link redirect="https://reversemortgagedaily.com/2017/02/08/ever-rising-home-prices-may-not-boost-reverse-mortgage-market/"]