The negative perception surrounding reverse mortgages not only stunts the growth potential for these products to reach a wider consumer audience, but also deters financial planners from recommending the use of home equity for retirement income planning.
“In short, well-handled reverse mortgages have suffered from the bad press surrounding irresponsible reverse mortgages for too long,” writes Wade Pfau, professor of retirement income at The American College and director of retirement research at McLean Asset Management, in his new book, an excerpt of which appeared in Investment News this week.
Pfau’s book, “Reverse Mortgages: How to Use Reverse Mortgages to Secure Your Retirement,” hit shelves last month and has been generating considerable press in various financial planning news outlets, including Investment News and TIME Money.
Although the media begun to acknowledge the improvements that have taken place for reverse mortgages in recent years, the trend of positive coverage is still a new phenomenon.
And with so much pre-existing bias against these products, Pfau says it can be hard to view reverse mortgages objectively without a clear understanding of how the benefits exceed the costs.
“Reverse mortgages give responsible retirees the option to create liquidity from an otherwise illiquid asset, which can, in turn, potentially support a more efficient retirement income strategy,” he writes book.
At the crux of the book is the concept that retirees must support a variety of expenses if they want to enjoy a successful retirement. So while retirees will have to manage overall lifestyle spending, as well as account for unexpected contingencies and their legacy goals, they will have to look beyond traditional funding sources like Social Security and pensions.
But suppose retirees have two other assets such as an investment portfolio and home equity. The task then, according to Pfau, is to link these assets to spending obligations efficiently while also mitigating retirement risks like longevity market volatility and spending surprises that can impact the person’s plan.
“The fundamental question is this: How can these two assets work to meet spending goals while simultaneously preserving remaining assets to cover contingencies and support a legacy?” he asks.
Since spending from either asset (an investment portfolio and home equity) today means less will be available for future spending, the dilemma becomes how a retiree can best coordinate the use of these two assets to both meet spending goals and still preserve as much legacy as possible.
A reverse mortgage can be one viable option, Pfau notes, but this product is typically only considered as a last resort once the investment portfolio has been depleted.
“The research of the last few years has generally found this conventional wisdom constraining and counterproductive,” he writes. “Initiating the reverse mortgage earlier and coordinating spending from home equity throughout retirement can help meet spending goals while also providing a larger legacy.”
This, he says, is the nature of retirement income efficiency: “using assets in a way that allows for more spending and/or more legacy.”
Read more from Pfau’s book in this excerpt published by Investment News here.
Written by Jason OlivaPrint Article