CFPB Finalizes Rule to Increase Reverse Mortgage Data Reporting

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) finalized a rule today that it hopes will shed more light on the lending practices of financial institutions—reverse mortgage lenders included. 

The rule updates the reporting requirements under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA)—also known as Regulation C—which requires lenders to report information about the home loans for which they receive applications or that they originate or purchase.

Originally enacted in 1975, the HMDA serves as a resource for both the public and regulators so that they can use the information to monitor financial institutions, identify possible discriminatory lending, and assist in distributing public-sector investment so as to attack private investment to areas where it is needed, according to a statement the CFPB issued Thursday.


“With today’s final rule, we are shedding more light to foster better understanding of the market, and also ensuring that lenders have sufficient time to come into compliance,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray in a written statement.

Most of the provisions of the final rule are slated to take effect on January 1, 2018, with lenders expected to collect new information that year and then report this info by March 1, 2019. 

The final rule changes what data financial institutions are required to provide in order to improve the qualify of HMDA in today’s housing market, the CFPB stated.

Specifically, the final rule requires—among other things—that covered lenders report information about all applications and loans secured by dwellings, including reverse mortgages and open-end lines of credit. However, pre-approval requests for these same loans will not be covered transactions under the HMDA Rule effective Jan. 1, 2018.

Under exiting rules, financial institutions are required to report information about applications for, and originations of, closed-end loans made for home improvement, home purchase or refinancing. And this includes reverse mortgages as well. 

“Under existing Regulation C, reverse mortgages are subject to these same criteria for reporting: a closed-end reverse mortgage must be reported if it is for one of the three purposes; a reverse mortgage that is an open-end line of credit is optionally reported,” states the final rule. 

The current regulation, however, does not define “reverse mortgage” or require financial institutions to identify which applications or loans are for reverse mortgages.

The CFPB said it received “a number of comments” specifically about the coverage of reverse mortgages under the HMDA, which included contrasting views between consumer advocacy groups and reverse mortgage industry participants.

On one hand, consumer groups largely supported the proposed reverse mortgage definition, arguing that having data about all reverse mortgages would be valuable to “ensure an adequate understanding” of the market. 

“These commenters stated that publicly available data about all reverse mortgages will be essential in the coming years as the country’s population ages and older consumers, many of whom are cash-poor but own their homes outright, may increasingly use home equity for living expenses and other purposes,” stated the CFPB in the final rule (p. 137).

Several reverse mortgage industry commenters, including trade associations and financial institutions, however, disagreed with the proposal to require all reporting of reverse mortgages.

Generally, commenters argued that this all-inclusive reporting would create new costs for financial institutions and that the burdens do not justify the potential benefits, as reverse mortgage lenders are already exiting the market as a result of “regulatory demands and uncertainties with reverse mortgages, and that requiring reporting of all reverse mortgages under HMDA would continue that trend.” 

“Some of these commenters asserted that Regulation C should not apply to reverse mortgages at all, or that reverse mortgages are outside the scope of HMDA,” the CFPB stated. “Others argued that the Bureau should maintain current coverage of reverse mortgages and require them to be reported only if they are for home purchase, home improvement, or refinancing.”

Industry stakeholders also argued in their opposition to the rule that the burden would have a serious impact on smaller firms, particularly lenders that make fewer than 100 loans in a year. 

While the CFPB acknowledged that additional data reporting will impose a burden on financial institutions, it believes that the benefits justify the burdens.

“Information on all reverse mortgages, regardless of purpose, would help communities understand the risks posed to local housing markets, thereby providing the citizens and public officials of the United States with sufficient information to enable them to determine whether financial institutions are filling their obligations to serve the housing needs of the communities and neighborhoods in which they are located,” the CFPB stated.

Requiring the reporting of all reverse mortgages, the CFPB suggests, would also help welcome more private investment in the sector.

“[T]he proprietary market for reverse mortgages has substantially declined in recent years,” the CFPB stated. “Thus, requiring improved information regarding all reverse mortgages would assist public officials in their determination of the distribution of public sector investments in a manner designed to improve the private investment environment.” 

View the CFPB final rule. 

Written by Jason Oliva

Join the Conversation (2)

see all

This is a professional community. Please use discretion when posting a comment.

  • Up to this time the Reverse Mortgage program with Financial Assessment is great.The latter strengthens the program into the future.

    Any further tinkering by the CFPB will be negative-stop when you are ahead. Bureaucracies are self-perpetuating growth animals that outgrow their usefulness and productiveness. It is always tempting to want to “Improve” things but remember that the government that governs least, leaving folks free to choose, is always the best recipe.

  • I agree with Steve in his comment, in fact the analogy he uses is right on target!

    I further want to add that the Federal Government through the “Financial Regulatory Reform Bill”, commonly known as the Dodd-Frank Bill, which formed the CFPB, has done everything it can to destroy the small community banks through a barrage of “Federal Regulations”!

    This only adds a great deal more fuel to the fire for these small banks. Their compliance departments can’t handle what they have now, this will become another crippling impact on them.

    As far as what the CFPB is calling for on reverse mortgages, it is absurd to say the least. This is another measure implemented by the CFPB and the Federal Government to track seniors and where their wealth and assets are, pure and simple.

    The CFPB has targeted reverse mortgages as one of their priorities to regulate with a strong hand, especially over the past two years!

    Those within the CFPB lacks the experience needed to regulate our industry.

    However, I will give them credit for being an advocator of the NBS and the FA ruling, which will only benefit the industry as a whole and our seniors in the long run!

    John A. Smaldone

    This is the expressed opinion of John A. Smaldone only and does not represent an opinion of Willow Bend Mortgage or our affiliates.

string(108) ""

Share your opinion