CFPB Seeks to Streamline Inherited Regulations

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) announced on Tuesday that it will seek public opinion on how to streamline regulations stemming  more than a dozen consumer financial laws that the agency inherited from seven different federal agencies with the implementation of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

“Our goal is to make it easier for banks, credit unions and others to follow the rules,” said Raj Date, Special Advisor to the Secretary of the Treasury on the CFPB, whose authority replaces that of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), among other agencies. “We’re asking the public to help us identify and prioritize concrete ways that we can streamline the regulations we inherited so that they work better for consumers and the firms that serve them.”

The public is being asked to identify provisions of inherited regulations that deserve top priority from the CFPB for updating, modifying, or eliminating because they’re “outdated, unduly burdensome, or unnecessary.”


The bureau is also open to suggestions that could help make regulatory compliance easier.

These suggestions, says the CFPB, could include ways to simplify regulations that have become unnecessarily difficult to understand or comply with over time; standardize definitions of common terms across regulations where statutes permit; update regulations that are now outdated or unnecessary due to changing technologies; or remove unnecessary restrictions on consumer choice or business innovation.

The CFPB now plans to republish inherited regulations and to consider “practical measures that will make it easier for firms, especially smaller ones, to comply with the inherited regulations.”

Prior to the bureau’s establishment, rule-writing authority was held by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, HUD, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Federal Trade Commission, National Credit Union Administration, Office of Comptroller of the Currency, and Office of Thrift Supervision.

Click here to find out how to submit comments.

Written by Alyssa Gerace

Join the Conversation (1)

see all

This is a professional community. Please use discretion when posting a comment.

  • As to so called “cross-selling” the industry needs a bright line test which HERA failed to provide.  Section V.G. of proposed R-1390 would have done just that; however, the FRB (Federal Reverse Board) in a notice posted February 1, 2011, deferred to the CFPB (Consumer Financial Protection Bureau) for its decision on this important proposal. 

    R-1390 was published on September 20, 2010 in the Federal Registered as a proposal to amend Regulation Z.  Section V.G. states:

    “The proposal would prohibit a creditor or loan originator from requiring a consumer to purchase another financial or insurance product as a condition of obtaining a reverse mortgage.
    A creditor or loan originator will be deemed not to have required the purchase of another product if:  1) the consumer receives the ‘Key Questions to Ask about Reverse Mortgage Loans’ document; and 2) the reverse mortgage is consummated (or the account is opened for a HELOC) at least ten days before the consumer purchases another financial or insurance product.”

    Having the second paragraph would be a huge help to the industry in clarifying what so called “cross-selling” as defined in HERA actually means. We as an industry need to encourage the CFPB to adopt this clarification.

string(94) ""

Share your opinion