CFPB Director Hearing Rehashes Partisan Concerns

A Senate Committee hearing Tuesday to address the nomination of former Ohio Attorney General Richard Cordray to lead the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau turned into a discussion much more focused on the structure of the CFPB’s governance than of the nomination itself.

The delay in nominating a director is harming Americans, noted committee member Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), making note of senior protections and reverse mortgages.

Without the director, he said, “Seniors don’t win, they’re still at the mercy of predatory reverse mortgage lenders…it will not only be bad for consumers, it will be bad for the country.”

Advertisement

The hearing, which had been postponed from August, brought to light past concerns of republican senators who have vowed to block any director confirmation without changes to the bureau’s leadership structure. Republican members of the Senate Banking Committee stressed that the hearing was premature pending those changes, which would include restructuring the leadership to become a five-member commission rather than a single director.

“No one person should have such unfettered power,” said ranking member Richard Shelby (R-Ala.). “Unless the bureau is reformed, it’s only a matter of time until the power of this bureau is misused.”

In calling those senators a “vocal minority,” Committee Chairman Tim Johnson (D-S.D.) dismissed their position as “political gamemanship,” which threatens consumer protections.

“This vocal minority insists on rehashing the same debate Congress had last year when it created the CFPB as an accountable yet independent regulator,” Johnson said.

In defending the bureau’s oversight, Cordray, who currently serves as the CFPB’s enforcement chief, noted some of the CFPB’s powers and obligations.

“We should be attentive to legislative oversight. We pay close attention to audits…at the CFPB we will take our audit obligations very seriously,” he said.

Written by Elizabeth Ecker

Join the Conversation (2)

see all

This is a professional community. Please use discretion when posting a comment.

  • “We pay close attention to audits…at the CFPB we will take our audit obligations very seriously.”
     
    I realize attorneys are good litigators but auditors?  What audits has the CFPB done to date?  If it has done even one what scrutiny has it been held up to?  Per the League of Women Voters, Mr. Cordray is by background an appellate and constitutional litigator.  Like the President, even his wife is an attorney.  Where are his audit credentials?
     
    What a strange comment for someone with no experience actually auditing and from a government bureau that has yet to officially get started because of the lack of a confirmed director.  Dodd-Frank did not even become law until July 21st of last year.
     
    Based on that somewhat less than credible statement, are we supposed to have confidence in this director?  If the chairman is overseeing basically or signficantly an audit function, then bring someone in with some actual experience auditing like a fully qualified CPA, CFE, or depending on the primary audit function, a CIA; this is like nominating a extremely skilled and recognized MD with no education in law or legal experience to the position of Solicitor General or Attorney General. 

    Is Mr. Cordray actually prepared to perform his duties?  Perhaps the job should be handled by five directors, one of whom is Mr. Cordray and another, an experienced auditor.

  • “We pay close attention to audits…at the CFPB we will take our audit obligations very seriously.”
     
    I realize attorneys are good litigators but auditors?  What audits has the CFPB done to date?  If it has done even one what scrutiny has it been held up to?  Per the League of Women Voters, Mr. Cordray is by background an appellate and constitutional litigator.  Like the President, even his wife is an attorney.  Where are his audit credentials?
     
    What a strange comment for someone with no experience actually auditing and from a government bureau that has yet to officially get started because of the lack of a confirmed director.  Dodd-Frank did not even become law until July 21st of last year.
     
    Based on that somewhat less than credible statement, are we supposed to have confidence in this director?  If the chairman is overseeing basically or signficantly an audit function, then bring someone in with some actual experience auditing like a fully qualified CPA, CFE, or depending on the primary audit function, a CIA; this is like nominating a extremely skilled and recognized MD with no education in law or legal experience to the position of Solicitor General or Attorney General. 

    Is Mr. Cordray actually prepared to perform his duties?  Perhaps the job should be handled by five directors, one of whom is Mr. Cordray and another, an experienced auditor.

string(93) "https://reversemortgagedaily.com/2011/09/07/cfpb-director-hearing-rehashes-partisan-concerns/"

Share your opinion

[wpli_login_link redirect="https://reversemortgagedaily.com/2011/09/07/cfpb-director-hearing-rehashes-partisan-concerns/"]