HUD Awards $8 Million in Reverse Mortgage Counseling Grants

image The U.S. Housing and Urban Development awarded $60 million in housing counseling and training grants to help assist families in becoming first-time homeowners and remain homeowners after their purchase said a statement from HUD.  

“Now, more than ever, it is crucial that Americans better understand how to manage their money, navigate the homebuying process, and secure their financial future,” said Shaun Donovan, HUD Secretary.  “This critical funding will help counseling organizations continue to assist families in making more informed choices before they purchase a home and counsel families facing foreclosure.”

More than $55 million will support the direct provision of housing counseling services by 24 national and regional organizations, 5 multi-state organizations, and 463 state and local housing counseling agencies. 


In addition, HUD is awarding $5 million to three national organizations to train approximately 4,400 counselors who will receive the instruction and certification necessary to effectively assist families with their housing needs.

Counseling agencies will use $8 million to help assist senior citizens seeking reverse mortgages to meet the rapidly growing number of elderly homeowners who seek to convert equity in their homes into income that can be used to pay for home improvements, medical costs, and other living expenses.

Join the Conversation (5)

see all

This is a professional community. Please use discretion when posting a comment.

  • Can any of this funding be used to prepare counselors for the California specifc requirements under AB 329?

    It will be interesting to see how many counseling agencies will be willing to provide the additional counseling AB 329 requires and if willing, how much of an additional fee, if any, is required.

  • Perhaps State Taxpayers should be required to pay for State specific counseling requirements training and additional counseling session segments. Why should taxpayers in other States be required to pay for
    another State's requirements? Maybe Legislatures would think twice about requiring additional subject matter if the Federal Government wasn't going to provide money for those State decisions. I mean: California your debt situation is already the laughing stock of the Country. Why burden your State taxpayers with more?

  • James Nelson,

    Well stated! I almost laughed at the Critics suggestion.
    I wasn't sure if he was serious. Maybe he should bring it up to Pelosi. She seems to want to fund everything else with taxpayer money!!!

  • James Nelson,rnrnWell stated! I almost laughed at the Critics suggestion.rnI wasn’t sure if he was serious. Maybe he should bring it up to Pelosi. She seems to want to fund everything else with taxpayer money!!!

string(103) ""

Share your opinion