WSJ: Seniors Drawn to Reverse Mortgages

Wall Street Journal Logo A new article from the Wall Street Journal describes how there is one segment of the mortgage market that is still hot: federally insured reverse mortgages.  In Seniors Drawn to Mortgages That Give Back, Nick Timiraos writes that more seniors are turning to reverse mortgages to supplement their retirement savings, which in some cases have been decimated by stock-market losses.

The article points out that while reverse mortgages are more popular than ever, borrowers find that their homes are not worth as much as they had thought.  Around one-third of borrowers who might have closed reverse mortgages two years ago no longer have enough equity in their homes to qualify, says Jeff Lewis, chairman of Generation Mortgage Co., an Atlanta brokerage. He estimates around 85% of his reverse-mortgage customers are retiring their existing mortgages.

It’s not clear how much the drop in home values will hit FHA, but HUD asked for nearly $800 million in taxpayer money next year to boost its loan-loss reserves due to deteriorating home prices. It is the first taxpayer subsidy in the 20-year history of the program. “Needless to say, this program is very sensitive to the projected path of long-term house price appreciation,” HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan told industry leaders last month at a conference.


Some say that the subsidy is a sign that the FHA needs to raise the insurance premiums borrowers pay that normally cover losses. “The government is giving people too much money,” Mr. Lewis says. Mr. Donovan says the agency opted against increasing insurance premiums on seniors “given the current pressure on retirement savings.”

Mr. Timiraos was also featured on CNBC this morning along with CNBC’s Diana Olick, which you watch here.
Seniors Drawn to Mortgages That Give Back (Wall Street Journal)

Join the Conversation (0)

see all

This is a professional community. Please use discretion when posting a comment.

  • I think this was a good article and I emailed him to tell him so. I also slipped in the alink to the Zickefoose story.

    BTW: my window for RMD is screwed up since I watched the CNBC spot, so I can’t really see what I am writing. Sorry for the typos, if Aany.

  • It is interesting that a generally positive article, like this, generates virtually no heat and interest on a forum, like this.
    But the negative stoties (CNBC) has people going ballistic. Maybe, the journalists are correct, that negative news creates more interest.

  • Critic

    I’m sorry, I have always seen the glass as half full. I, say the industry, of which I am not a part, did gain a measure, when looked at by potential RM users or their children of seniors, or attorneys, or accountants, and not by you people in the industry who only seem to like articles that are 100% in your favor. Give me a break, Kneale’s producers could have set this up with a lawyer and an accountant both with negative view points (perhaps one as a straw man). Be grateful, they (journalists)can kill you.
    Also, you may now have that rare commodity, a journalist who favors the RM product. I received this in response to my email to Mr. Timiraos of the WSJ. (I also sent him a link to the Zickefoose story.)
    “Thanks for the note. Indeed, RMs are seen as an interesting loan
    modification approach that may get more popular in the months ahead.”

  • Critic

    Sorry, got my threads mixed up. Glad I surprised you though, but many people not being as erudite as you may not know the behind the scenes interplay at a TV station “newsroom”.
    I’ll try to restrain myself, in the future, from stating the obvious.

string(83) ""

Share your opinion

[wpli_login_link redirect=""]