National Public Radio Says Reverse Mortgages Popular As Portfolios Shrink

Over the weekend National Public Radio featured a segment called “Reverse Mortgages Popular as Portfolios Shrink” which touched on the upcoming changes to reverse mortgages and what it means for baby boomers.  NPR reporter Curt Nickisch describes how more elderly Americans are seeing reverse mortgages as a useful financial tool rather than something used only as a last resort.

Nickisch speaks with different people including a Boston couple who recently took out a reverse mortgage and couldn’t be happier with the results.  The segment also features commentary from Your Home for Life Company, a financial planner, and the director of the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.  Below is a copy of the transcript:


CURT NICKISCH: Larry and Mary Holland are retired, and they’re happy. The 78-year-olds have enough cash flow that they got new windows for their modest home in the Boston suburbs. Sitting on their living room couch with her feet barely touching the brown-shag carpet, Mary Holland says she and Larry even have enough money to splurge now and then by going to a casino in Connecticut.

Ms. MARY HOLLAND (Retiree, Norwood, Massachusetts): We enjoy going down there once a month or every other month or something, you know. And we don’t lose a lot because we don’t like to lose. We don’t win a lot, but we have a good time. We can afford to do that once, you know.

NICKISCH: The Hollands can afford to do that because they took out a reverse mortgage on about a quarter of the value of their home. That means the house is partly owned by the bank now, but they receive $800 a month tax free they otherwise would not have. Lately, more elderly Americans are joining the Hollands in seeing reverse mortgages as a useful financial tool rather than a last resort.

Mr. JOHN BRODERICK (President, Your Home for Life Company): Public perception is changing as more of these are being done.

NICKISCH: That’s John Broderick. He sells reverse mortgages through his Massachusetts company, Your Home for Life. He says, as the stock market tanks and takes 401Ks down with it, his business has been climbing.

Mr. BRODERICK: So many folks are seeing their retirement accounts disappear, and yet, they still have this asset, the home, and this is really the only vehicle where you can get out the equity without having to make a payment or sell your house.

NICKISCH: Now, it’s easier to get reverse mortgages. The limit for federally-insured ones has been raised to more than $400,000. That makes them more attractive in expensive real-estate markets on the coasts. Plus, anyone who sells a reverse mortgage is banned from hocking other financial products to the same customer, correcting an abuse of the past. Finally, the origination fees are capped, though Boston financial planner John LeBlanc says those fees can still be high.

Mr. JOHN LEBLANC (Financial Planner): Frequently, you’re talking about 11 or 12 percent of the amount that you can borrow. It’s still expensive. It’s still buyer beware.

NICKISCH: And there’s a psychological barrier for many people. A home they may have owned free and clear for decades is going back to the bank.

Dr. ALICIA MUNNELL (Director, Center for Retirement Research, Boston College): This gut-wrenching thing, that you won’t have a house to leave to your daughter or your son or you niece.

NICKISCH: Alicia Munnell heads the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College. She said it’s unfortunate, but the way things are going, more and more retirees will need to take out reverse mortgages.

Dr. MUNNELL: I think it’s going to be a necessity, and so we all have an interest in making that market work as well as it possibly can.

NICKISCH: Munnell praises the new regulations to make reverse mortgages more consumer-friendly and less costly. But even before today’s new rules, it was worth it for Larry and Mary Holland in Norwood, Massachusetts.

Ms. HOLLAND: Just so I don’t have any money worries, you know. Our children have their own places, so we don’t have to worry about, you know, saving it for them. So, we just have a very happy life.

NICKISCH: Boston College’s Munnell hopes that other people’s lives will improve, too, as the reverse mortgage market grows and increased competition brings consumer costs down more. For NPR News, I’m Curt Nickisch in Boston.

To listen to the segment click the link below

Reverse Mortgages Popular As Portfolio Shrinks

Join the Conversation (0)

see all

This is a professional community. Please use discretion when posting a comment.

  • With an FHA reverse mortgage title to the home always remains in the name of the bor. This article makes it appear that the bank takes partial ownership of the home. Misleading in my opinion and I, as a seasoned reverse mortgage loan officer of 18 yrs 9 mos work dilligently to explain this to bors, many of whom think the bank will take their home.
    I, personally, have an FHA reverse mortgage that I took advantage of this past summer because spouse & I retain ownership.

  • Thank you for focusing on the benefits of Reverse Mortgages and that they can be an excellent financial tool. Now is not the time to liquidate investments and take losses; rather, a time to salvage home equity. If seniors don’t need money now, it can go into a Line of Credit so it’s there when they need it — better than continuing to watch the equity go down the drain!

  • Why didn’t one of the panel members immediately correct the obviously misinformed NPR reporter when he commented that after being debt free the home is going back to the bank. That upsets me that this comment was let go. In addition, I don’t mind that the comment was made but how many retired folks that are struggling are worried about leaving the home to the neice? What a strange and unrealistic comment.

string(118) ""

Share your opinion