Upon the reappointment of Richard Cordray to lead the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a court ruling has called into question his directorship as well enforcement of the rules made by the agency under his watch—including rules that are slated to have a major impact on the mortgage lending industry.
Because Cordray was named director of the CFPB through a recess appointment by President Obama, if that recess appointment is questioned, so will the rules made under Cordray’s watch as director.
That’s just what happened Friday, when a U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington D.C. ruled three recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board by President Obama were unconstitutional because of the circumstances surrounding the “recess” during which they were made. That ruling may set precedent for the CFPB’s leadership as well.
Those recess appointments, similar to the appointment of Cordray, were made in January 2012 during a 20-day Senate recess, but during which the Senate held ongoing pro forma sessions to keep the Senate in session.
The recess appointment was made following scrutiny over whether the CFPB wielded too much power under a single director, a concern made very public by house Republicans as well as members of the Senate. Further, the CFPB only holds authority over non-banks if it has a director, as specified by Dodd-Frank.
“Regarding the CFPB, while I respect Richard Cordray as a substantive person who has shown thoughtfulness in writing regulation up to now, I still have reservations about the CFPB’s structure, namely the lack of a board to help ensure sound policy and accountability,” said Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) following the NLRB decision.
President Obama has said he will reappoint Cordray, but the question remains what would—or will—become of all the CFPB’s enforcement capabilities including changes to loan originator compensation, home appraisals, mortgage servicing and others. It has led to widespread uncertainty in the market pending a resolution.
The White House is expected to appeal the ruling. In the meantime, the decision has spawned a flurry of concern in Washington about what it means for these agencies and the government overall.
“Time is not the friend of the CFPB with this situation hanging out there,” says Chris Willis, partner with Ballard & Spahr LLP. “Right now, everybody is thinking: ‘ Can we challenge everything because the agency doesn’t have an appointed director?’ It gives entities opportunities to challenge anything they want to on the basis that there isn’t a proper director in place. The longer it persists, the worse off the agency is.”
Questions remain, too, about the future of the agency’s leadership as well as the past recess appointments that have been made.
“Obama renominated Cordray Jan. 24, but the chances that the Senate will confirm him are slim to none, which is why Obama sought to bypass the Senate in the first place,” wrote Bloomberg View editorial board member Payla Dwyer of the ruling. “…For now, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the labor-relations board are essentially decapitated. The future of the recess appointment as used by past presidents is also in doubt.”
“The decision is novel and unprecedented,” said White House Press Secretary Jay Carney. “…it contradicts 150 years of practice by Democratic and Republican administrations. We respectfully but strongly disagree with the ruling.”
View the ruling.
Written by Elizabeth EckerEmail This Post Print This Post
- Related Posts
- CFPB’s Work Hampered by Legal Snare
- Supreme Court Ruling Could Have Monumental CFPB Impact
- DOJ Says OK to Cordray, CFPB to Begin Mortgage Exams in February