Reverse Mortgage Daily

  • Home
  • About
  • Wholesale Lenders
  • Jobs
  • Awards
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Data
  • Content
  • Categories
    • Alternatives
      • EquityKey
      • REX
    • American Advisors Group
    • CFPB
    • Chart of the Day
    • Commentary
    • Counseling
    • Data
    • Events
    • FHA
    • GNMA
    • Gov. Updates
    • International
    • Interview Series
    • Jumbo Products
    • Leads
    • Legislation
    • Lenders
    • Live Well
    • Marketing
    • MBA Reverse
    • Moneyhouse
    • New Category
    • New York Life
    • News
    • NRMLA
    • Podcast
    • Products
      • 1st Reverse
      • Bank of America
      • Countrywide
      • Financial Freedom
      • FNMA Homekeeper
      • Generation Mortgage
      • Gold Reverse
      • Golden Gateway
      • Guardian First
      • HECM
      • JB Nutter
      • Liberty Reverse
      • Live Well Financial
      • LLS
      • MetLife
      • Quicken
      • Reverseit
      • Seattle Mortgage
      • Security One
      • Sun West
      • Virtual Bank
      • Wells Fargo
    • Rates
    • Retirement
    • Reverse Mortgage
    • Reverse Mortgage Jobs
    • Senior Housing
    • Servicers
      • Celink
      • RMS
    • Technology
      • Bay Docs
      • Mortgage Cadence
      • Reverse Vision
    • Top HECM Lenders
    • Training
    • Video
    • Warehouse Lines
  • RSS




« FinCEN Director: Agencies Working to Reduce Reverse Mortgage Fraud
CFPB Adds Senior Leadership Positions With New Hires »

Fed Responds to Delay in Loan Officer Compensation Rule

April 4th, 2011  |  by Elizabeth Ecker Published in News, Reverse Mortgage  |  3 Comments

The Federal Reserve Board today opposed a U.S. appellate court decision to grant a stay on implementation of the Fed’s loan officer compensation rule.

Following a lawsuit filed by the National Association of Independent Housing Professionals and National Association of Mortgage Brokers, the stay was granted just hours before the rule was scheduled to take effect on April 1. The Fed’s opposition papers, filed today to the Court of Appeals, dispute the chances of a continued delay in implementation of the rule.

“Appellants have little chance of success on the merits, and this factor alone can be sufficient to deny the stay even where irreparable harm is shown…Certainly where any irreparable harm to the appellants is balanced against irreparable harm to the public, consideration of all the factors counsels against a stay pending appeal,” the Fed documents said.

In an interview with RMD last week, NAIHP President Marc Savitt walked us through the upcoming process: After the trade associations respond to the Fed’s latest opposition, the appellate court will decide whether to keep the stay or lift the stay. “If they continue the stay,” Savitt said, “that’s somewhat of an indication if we are able to prevail.”

In the Fed’s opposition statement, the board also referred to the April 1 implementation date as providing sufficient time for creditors and loan originators to make the necessary adjustments to their compensation agreements and practices to conform to the final rule.

Upon the stay being granted, several reverse mortgage lenders appeared to be honoring applications submitted under their former compensation structures and/or pushing the deadline for implementing the rule until this week.

Following the Fed’s statement, the NAIHP and NAMB have the opportunity respond by 10 am on Tuesday April 5.

See the Fed’s statement.

Written by Elizabeth Ecker


Sign up to receive free updates like this by email or subscribe by RSS feed. Thanks for reading!

  • Share this:
Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post
    Related Posts
  • Groups Reply to Fed on LO Compensation Rule Delay; Court Lifts Stay (update)
  • Federal Reserve’s Loan Officer Compensation Rule Delayed (update)
  • Fed Responds to Loan Officer Compensation Lawsuits



  • John A. Smaldone

    Should we expect any more from the Federal Reserve. I think we all knew how it was going to turn out.

    It is sad because the Fed’s do not have a clue!

    John A.Smaldone

  • John A. Smaldone

    Should we expect any more from the Federal Reserve. I think we all knew how it was going to turn out.

    It is sad because the Fed’s do not have a clue!

    John A.Smaldone

  • Anonymous

    This would be an amusing soap opera/court drama/ if it didn’t impact our livelihood..

.

Daily news on the reverse mortgage industry delivered to your inbox.



Wholesale Lender Sponsors







Sponsors






Exclusive Training Provider







RSS Reverse Mortgage Jobs

  • Reverse Mortgage Underwriter
  • MetLife Reverse Mortgage Professionals Wanted
  • Reverse Mortgage Consultant
  • Reverse Mortgage Consultant
  • Reverse Originator
  • Loan Officer
  • Reverse Mortgage Originator Virginia
  • Reverse Mortgage Originator Maryland

Recent Articles

  • Silvergate Grows Reverse Mortgage Business for Near-Record Earnings
  • CFPB To Mortgage Originators: We Hear Your Compensation Concerns
  • CNBC: Trade in Bills for Monthy Checks—Reverse Mortgages Rediscovered
  • Recession Leads to Loss of Retirement Hope, 43% Have No Savings Plan
  • Lenders Shift from Kitchen Table, Adapt to New Reverse Mortgage Landscape
  • Cantor Fitzgerald Presents Reverse Mortgage “Mythbuster”
  • Reverse Mortgage Industry Seeks QRM Definition from CFPB

Popular Posts

  • CFPB To Propose "Problematic" Compensation Rule For Reverse Mortgages?
  • Are Reverse Mortgages the New Key To Long Term Care at Home?
  • Lenders Shift from Kitchen Table, Adapt to New Reverse Mortgage Landscape
  • Cantor Fitzgerald Presents Reverse Mortgage "Mythbuster"
  • CBS Local News: Reverse Mortgages Work Well, With Caution


Our Sites

Long Term Care Daily

Senior Housing News

Home Health Care News


©2012 Reverse Mortgage Daily
Powered by WordPress using the Gridline Lite theme by Graph Paper Press.