Reverse Mortgage Daily

  • Home
  • About
  • Wholesale Lenders
  • Jobs
  • Awards
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Data
  • Content
  • Categories
    • Alternatives
      • EquityKey
      • REX
    • American Advisors Group
    • Chart of the Day
    • Commentary
    • Counseling
    • Data
    • Events
    • FHA
    • GNMA
    • Gov. Updates
    • International
    • Interview Series
    • Jumbo Products
    • Leads
    • Legislation
    • Lenders
    • Live Well
    • Marketing
    • MBA Reverse
    • News
    • NRMLA
    • Podcast
    • Products
      • 1st Reverse
      • Bank of America
      • Countrywide
      • Financial Freedom
      • FNMA Homekeeper
      • Generation Mortgage
      • Gold Reverse
      • Golden Gateway
      • Guardian First
      • HECM
      • JB Nutter
      • Liberty Reverse
      • Live Well Financial
      • LLS
      • MetLife
      • Quicken
      • Reverseit
      • Seattle Mortgage
      • Security One
      • Sun West
      • Virtual Bank
      • Wells Fargo
    • Rates
    • Retirement
    • Reverse Mortgage
    • Reverse Mortgage Jobs
    • Senior Housing
    • Servicers
      • Celink
      • RMS
    • Technology
      • Bay Docs
      • Mortgage Cadence
      • Reverse Vision
    • Top HECM Lenders
    • Training
    • Video
    • Warehouse Lines
  • RSS



« Second Consecutive Quarterly Decline in Negative Equity Rates
Percentage of Older Americans Filing Bankruptcy Up 61% says Study »

WSJ: Federal Backing of Mortgages Could Be Paid by Industry Fees

September 8th, 2010  |  by John Yedinak Published in News, Reverse Mortgage  |  3 Comments

The Wall Street Journal is reporting the Obama administration may propose that any federal backing of mortgages be paid for through fees on the lending industry, according to people familiar with the internal discussions.

While the administration hasn’t settled on a plan to revamp failed mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, a consensus appears to be emerging that some type of government guarantee will be needed to keep the ailing mortgage market functioning.

Some conservatives don’t believe the government should offer any type of guarantee, while others advocate limited, but explicit, backing. About nine in 10 new loans are currently backed by Fannie, Freddie or government agencies.

Policy makers face challenges determining what types of loans or mortgage-backed securities should be guaranteed and how the industry should be charged for government backing. Government officials want the cost of any explicit guarantee fully offset by the mortgage industry to avoid adding to the federal budget deficit.

But Washington must walk a fine line between pricing a guarantee high enough so it accurately reflects risk, while not charging so much that borrowing costs soar.

Read more at the WSJ here.


Sign up to receive free updates like this by email or subscribe by RSS feed. Thanks for reading!

  • Share this:

Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post
    Related Posts
  • FHFA Director Concerned About Government Role in Mortgage Lending
  • Payroll Tax Extension Proposal Could Increase Cost of FHA Mortgages
  • Less Government in Obama’s Housing Reform, Plans to Strengthen FHA



  • Anonymous

    There are two principal ways this concept can be funded. The first is to try to project how much will be needed and fund it on an ongoing basis. The second way is to fund it as required.rnrnIf the plan is to fund it on an ongoing basis (as it should be), wait until lenders hear the home appreciation rates which OMB is using with HECMs. Will the same u201cconservativeu201d rates be used here?rnrnIf it is funded as needed, not even the federal government should be sponsoring another form of a Ponzi scheme, i.e., later borrowers will be paying the losses of earlier borrowers.rnrnWhat is clear is that our government cannot support health care, foreign wars, home ownership, green initiatives, General Motors, AIG, Stimulus Packages, Cash for Clunkers, and everything else it is dreaming up without a significant associated cost. It is clear this Administration has all of the programs anyone can think of but fails to recognize they might cost something until it is well down the road to instituting them. Its style is: u201cFigure out what people want. Weu2019ll figure out how to pay for them (maybe) some time in the future.u201d rn

  • Bill315peters

    Should’ve stopped after the 3rd paragraph; this isn’t a political blog.

  • Anonymous

    Bill,rnrnIt is what it is. rnrnOnce in a while politics comes into play when it comes especially to HECMs. Or does it? You be the judge.

.


Wholesale Lender Sponsors





Sponsors






Exclusive Training Provider







RSS Reverse Mortgage Jobs

  • Retail Sales Manager
  • Reverse Mortgage Consultant
  • Reverse Mortgage Consultant
  • Reverse Mortgage Consultant
  • Reverse Mortgage Consultant
  • Reverse Mortgage Branch Manager
  • Reverse Mortgage Consultant
  • Fed Charter Now Hiring Reverse LO's Nationally

Recent Articles

  • House Bill Aims to Save FHA Mortgage Insurance Fund in “Crisis”
  • Are You Compliant? State Regulators Release SAFE Act Examination Guidelines
  • Ron Paul: The CFPB Will Harm Consumers
  • Social Media Marketing for Reverse Mortgages: Worth The Risks?
  • Bank Supervisors Set Sights on Uniform Loan Officer State Test
  • New Rule Requires all Non-Bank Mortgage Lenders File Fraud Reports
  • Wendover Hires Former B of A, Financial Freedom Reverse Mortgage Execs

Popular Posts

  • Financial Assessment Leads to Reverse Mortgage Musical Chairs
  • Google Shuts Down Mortgage Rate Comparison Tool
  • CFPB Begins Mortgage Audits. What Can Lenders Expect?
  • Wendover Hires Former B of A, Financial Freedom Reverse Mortgage Execs
  • LA Times: Reverse Mortgage May Be Best Option


Our Sites

Long Term Care Daily

Senior Housing News


©2012 Reverse Mortgage Daily
Powered by WordPress using the Gridline Lite theme by Graph Paper Press.