Reverse Mortgage Daily

  • Home
  • About
  • Wholesale Lenders
  • Jobs
  • Awards
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Data
  • Content
  • Categories
    • Alternatives
      • EquityKey
      • REX
    • American Advisors Group
    • CFPB
    • Chart of the Day
    • Commentary
    • Counseling
    • Data
    • Events
    • FHA
    • GNMA
    • Gov. Updates
    • International
    • Interview Series
    • Jumbo Products
    • Leads
    • Legislation
    • Lenders
    • Live Well
    • Marketing
    • MBA Reverse
    • Moneyhouse
    • New Category
    • New York Life
    • News
    • NRMLA
    • Podcast
    • Products
      • 1st Reverse
      • Bank of America
      • Countrywide
      • Financial Freedom
      • FNMA Homekeeper
      • Generation Mortgage
      • Gold Reverse
      • Golden Gateway
      • Guardian First
      • HECM
      • JB Nutter
      • Liberty Reverse
      • Live Well Financial
      • LLS
      • MetLife
      • Quicken
      • Reverseit
      • Seattle Mortgage
      • Security One
      • Sun West
      • Virtual Bank
      • Wells Fargo
    • Rates
    • Retirement
    • Reverse Mortgage
    • Reverse Mortgage Jobs
    • Senior Housing
    • Servicers
      • Celink
      • RMS
    • Technology
      • Bay Docs
      • Mortgage Cadence
      • Reverse Vision
    • Top HECM Lenders
    • Training
    • Video
    • Warehouse Lines
  • RSS




« New Credit Requirements for FHA Borrowers
Second Consecutive Quarterly Decline in Negative Equity Rates »

Bank of America Rolls Out No Servicing Fee Adjustable Rate HECM for Wholesale

September 7th, 2010  |  by John Yedinak Published in Bank of America, News, Reverse Mortgage  |  36 Comments

NewImage.jpgBank of America introduced a new adjustable rate Home Equity Conversion Mortgage (HECM) product to wholesale partners on Tuesday.

Starting September 7th, the company is offering a no servicing fee set aside (SFSA) monthly LIBOR HECM with a margin of 225 to brokers and closed loan sellers.

The new option should help brokers compete with MetLife and Wells Fargo, which have been offering a no SFSA adjustable rate product to consumers through their retail channels.

While brokers have been able to offer the HECM fixed without a SFSA for some time, BofA is the first wholesaler to introduce an adjustable rate product without a SFSA to brokers.  Additionally, BofA began paying 100% of the upfront mortgage insurance premium (MIP) for fixed rate HECMs in May.

According to data from Reverse Market Insight, BofA is the second largest wholesale reverse mortgage lender during 2010.


Sign up to receive free updates like this by email or subscribe by RSS feed. Thanks for reading!

  • Share this:
Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post
    Related Posts
  • MetLife Lowers Margin for Adjustable Rate HECM Products
  • Wells Fargo Eliminates Servicing and Origination Fee for Adjustable Rate HECM
  • Sun West Announces Zero Fee Reverse Mortgage



  • Anonymous

    2545,rnrnYou’re welcome.

  • Anonymous

    Cynic,rnThank you for your clarification. I appreciate it.

  • Anonymous

    2545,rnrnThe discussion you are referring to took place on August 26, 2010. On the following Monday, August 30th, NRMLA published a warning that HUD had just requested that NRMLA tell its members that the discussion which took place 4 days earlier was still preliminary.rnrnWe know the annual rate on the ongoing MIP will be 1.25% on October 4th because HUD released Mortgagee Letter 2010-28 on September 1st saying so. Until HUD makes an official announcement or releases a mortgagee letter with new PLF tables as it did in ML 2009-34 on September 23, 2009, we have no official word. rnrnSome of those who attended the NRMLA Policy Conference earlier this year stated a HUD official did say that if the release of the HECM Saver could be accomplished early in the new fiscal year (as it seems it will), there is a high probability that if the subsidy were recomputed reflecting the expected net revenues from the HECM Saver, the new computation would show no subsidy was needed. rnrnThe original OMB calculations released on February 1, 2010, apparently either did not reflect the HECM Saver or showed minimal impact from its expected net revenues. So it seems there is hope that the PLF change will be a reduction of between 1% and 5% even without any appropriation from Congress but there is no official statement from HUD just yet. rnrnWe will not know much until the Senate returns on the 13th. Even then, Congress may be loath to do anything because of pending elections. Some do not expect any official word on PLFs until late September.rnrnSo what are we to tell our fence sitting prospects between now and October 1st (or October 4th)? That is a question each lender and originator should be addressing right now.

  • Anonymous

    Cynic,rnYou also indicate the PFLs are still up in the air? I thought it was set at a 1% – 5% reduction…the 23% – 28% was not a possibility. At least this was indicated in the “FHA to Reduce HECM Proceeds and Raise Premiums in October” article that HUD had already settled on this issue. Do you not believe this to be the case?

  • Anonymous

    Cynic,rnI never claimed to be innocent?? Not much can be done at this point we just need to take it and move on. We do need as an industry to stay in Washington and continue to fight the fight so that we don’t again face this next Oct.

  • Anonymous

    I’m with you Judgem0811. I never understood why it was seperate to begin with. It’s always been fun (not) trying to explain that cost to borrowers when they never had to pay it on their forward mortgages (or so they thought).

  • Anonymous

    2545,rnrnYou would think you were as innocent as you were last year. YOU are not.rnrnWe are still in a subsidy fight for the fiscal year ending 9/30/2011. PLFs could be 1%-5% lower next month or 23%-28% lower or somewere in between. Who cares about 10/1/2011 RIGHT NOW. We need to brace ourselves for next month.

  • Anonymous

    Three cheers for the red, white and blue! Thank you BofA for making this a wholesale product!

  • Anonymous

    it is good to see them put the servicing fee back to where it is supposed to be, in the rate

  • Anonymous

    It may continue in Oct but business will take another plunge just like last year did when the Gov reduced funds. Now they are also raising MIP…I wonder what they will do in Oct of 2011? rnJust keeps getting better and better!

  • Anonymous

    Yes, it will be interesting to see if the “pricing war” continues in OCT!

  • Anonymous

    It sure is fascinating to watch the “bigs” slug it out! Reminds me of the old days when you had gas stations on opposite corners get into a price war.

  • Anonymous

    2545,rnrnYou’re welcome.

  • Anonymous

    Cynic,rnThank you for your clarification. I appreciate it.

  • Anonymous

    2545,rnrnThe discussion you are referring to took place on August 26, 2010. On the following Monday, August 30th, NRMLA published a warning that HUD had just requested that NRMLA tell its members that the discussion which took place 4 days earlier was still preliminary.rnrnWe know the annual rate on the ongoing MIP will be 1.25% on October 4th because HUD released Mortgagee Letter 2010-28 on September 1st saying so. Until HUD makes an official announcement or releases a mortgagee letter with new PLF tables as it did in ML 2009-34 on September 23, 2009, we have no official word. rnrnSome of those who attended the NRMLA Policy Conference earlier this year stated a HUD official did say that if the release of the HECM Saver could be accomplished early in the new fiscal year (as it seems it will), there is a high probability that if the subsidy were recomputed reflecting the expected net revenues from the HECM Saver, the new computation would show no subsidy was needed. rnrnThe original OMB calculations released on February 1, 2010, apparently either did not reflect the HECM Saver or showed minimal impact from its expected net revenues. So it seems there is hope that the PLF change will be a reduction of between 1% and 5% even without any appropriation from Congress but there is no official statement from HUD just yet. rnrnWe will not know much until the Senate returns on the 13th. Even then, Congress may be loath to do anything because of pending elections. Some do not expect any official word on PLFs until late September.rnrnSo what are we to tell our fence sitting prospects between now and October 1st (or October 4th)? That is a question each lender and originator should be addressing right now.

  • Anonymous

    Cynic,rnYou also indicate the PFLs are still up in the air? I thought it was set at a 1% – 5% reduction…the 23% – 28% was not a possibility. At least this was indicated in the “FHA to Reduce HECM Proceeds and Raise Premiums in October” article that HUD had already settled on this issue. Do you not believe this to be the case?

  • Anonymous

    Cynic,rnI never claimed to be innocent?? Not much can be done at this point we just need to take it and move on. We do need as an industry to stay in Washington and continue to fight the fight so that we don’t again face this next Oct.

  • Anonymous

    I’m with you Judgem0811. I never understood why it was seperate to begin with. It’s always been fun (not) trying to explain that cost to borrowers when they never had to pay it on their forward mortgages (or so they thought).

  • Anonymous

    2545,rnrnYou would think you were as innocent as you were last year. YOU are not.rnrnWe are still in a subsidy fight for the fiscal year ending 9/30/2011. PLFs could be 1%-5% lower next month or 23%-28% lower or somewere in between. Who cares about 10/1/2011 RIGHT NOW. We need to brace ourselves for next month.

  • Anonymous

    Three cheers for the red, white and blue! Thank you BofA for making this a wholesale product!

  • Anonymous

    it is good to see them put the servicing fee back to where it is supposed to be, in the rate

  • Anonymous

    It may continue in Oct but business will take another plunge just like last year did when the Gov reduced funds. Now they are also raising MIP…I wonder what they will do in Oct of 2011? rnJust keeps getting better and better!

  • Anonymous

    Yes, it will be interesting to see if the “pricing war” continues in OCT!

  • Anonymous

    It sure is fascinating to watch the “bigs” slug it out! Reminds me of the old days when you had gas stations on opposite corners get into a price war.

  • reversemaniac

    It sure is fascinating to watch the “bigs” slug it out! Reminds me of the old days when you had gas stations on opposite corners get into a price war.

  • Paul

    Yes, it will be interesting to see if the “pricing war” continues in OCT!

  • 2545

    It may continue in Oct but business will take another plunge just like last year did when the Gov reduced funds. Now they are also raising MIP…I wonder what they will do in Oct of 2011? rnJust keeps getting better and better!

  • Judgem0811

    it is good to see them put the servicing fee back to where it is supposed to be, in the rate

  • Anonymous

    Three cheers for the red, white and blue! Thank you BofA for making this a wholesale product!

  • Anonymous

    2545,rnrnYou would think you were as innocent as you were last year. YOU are not.rnrnWe are still in a subsidy fight for the fiscal year ending 9/30/2011. PLFs could be 1%-5% lower next month or 23%-28% lower or somewere in between. Who cares about 10/1/2011 RIGHT NOW. We need to brace ourselves for next month.

  • Going In Reverse

    I’m with you Judgem0811. I never understood why it was seperate to begin with. It’s always been fun (not) trying to explain that cost to borrowers when they never had to pay it on their forward mortgages (or so they thought).

  • 2545

    Cynic,rnI never claimed to be innocent?? Not much can be done at this point we just need to take it and move on. We do need as an industry to stay in Washington and continue to fight the fight so that we don’t again face this next Oct.

  • 2545

    Cynic,rnYou also indicate the PFLs are still up in the air? I thought it was set at a 1% – 5% reduction…the 23% – 28% was not a possibility. At least this was indicated in the “FHA to Reduce HECM Proceeds and Raise Premiums in October” article that HUD had already settled on this issue. Do you not believe this to be the case?

  • Anonymous

    2545,rnrnThe discussion you are referring to took place on August 26, 2010. On the following Monday, August 30th, NRMLA published a warning that HUD had just requested that NRMLA tell its members that the discussion which took place 4 days earlier was still preliminary.rnrnWe know the annual rate on the ongoing MIP will be 1.25% on October 4th because HUD released Mortgagee Letter 2010-28 on September 1st saying so. Until HUD makes an official announcement or releases a mortgagee letter with new PLF tables as it did in ML 2009-34 on September 23, 2009, we have no official word. rnrnSome of those who attended the NRMLA Policy Conference earlier this year stated a HUD official did say that if the release of the HECM Saver could be accomplished early in the new fiscal year (as it seems it will), there is a high probability that if the subsidy were recomputed reflecting the expected net revenues from the HECM Saver, the new computation would show no subsidy was needed. rnrnThe original OMB calculations released on February 1, 2010, apparently either did not reflect the HECM Saver or showed minimal impact from its expected net revenues. So it seems there is hope that the PLF change will be a reduction of between 1% and 5% even without any appropriation from Congress but there is no official statement from HUD just yet. rnrnWe will not know much until the Senate returns on the 13th. Even then, Congress may be loath to do anything because of pending elections. Some do not expect any official word on PLFs until late September.rnrnSo what are we to tell our fence sitting prospects between now and October 1st (or October 4th)? That is a question each lender and originator should be addressing right now.

  • 2545

    Cynic,rnThank you for your clarification. I appreciate it.

  • Anonymous

    2545,rnrnYou’re welcome.

.

Daily news on the reverse mortgage industry delivered to your inbox.



Wholesale Lender Sponsors







Sponsors






Exclusive Training Provider







RSS Reverse Mortgage Jobs

  • Reverse Mortgage Underwriter
  • MetLife Reverse Mortgage Professionals Wanted
  • Reverse Mortgage Consultant
  • Reverse Mortgage Consultant
  • Reverse Originator
  • Loan Officer
  • Reverse Mortgage Originator Virginia
  • Reverse Mortgage Originator Maryland

Recent Articles

  • Memorial Day Round-Up: Reverse Mortgage Online Leads to Trump TV?
  • S&P Affirms, Raises Celink Rankings As Reverse Mortgage Servicer
  • Financial Planners to Reverse Mortgage Lenders: Educate Us
  • Zillow: One-Third of U.S. Mortgages Now Underwater
  • Training Reminder: Which Product is Right for the Reverse Mortgage Consumer?
  • Credit Unions See Loan Origination Record, Uptick in Mortgages
  • On Slow Climb, Gallup Finds Economic Confidence Best Since ’08

Popular Posts

  • FHA To Change Up Condo Lending Requirements?
  • First Century Bank Rolls Out Reverse Mortgage Advisor Program
  • Reverse Mortgage "Pre" Counseling Serves Some, Not All
  • Will FHA Make Way for More Private Reverse Mortgages?
  • Financial Planners to Reverse Mortgage Lenders: Educate Us


Our Sites

Long Term Care Daily

Senior Housing News

Home Health Care News


©2012 Reverse Mortgage Daily
Powered by WordPress using the Gridline Lite theme by Graph Paper Press.