Reverse Mortgage Daily

  • Home
  • About
  • Wholesale Lenders
  • Jobs
  • Awards
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Data
  • Content
  • Categories
    • Alternatives
      • EquityKey
      • REX
    • American Advisors Group
    • CFPB
    • Chart of the Day
    • Commentary
    • Counseling
    • Data
    • Events
    • FHA
    • GNMA
    • Gov. Updates
    • International
    • Interview Series
    • Jumbo Products
    • Leads
    • Legislation
    • Lenders
    • Live Well
    • Marketing
    • MBA Reverse
    • Moneyhouse
    • New Category
    • New York Life
    • News
    • NRMLA
    • Podcast
    • Products
      • 1st Reverse
      • Bank of America
      • Countrywide
      • Financial Freedom
      • FNMA Homekeeper
      • Generation Mortgage
      • Gold Reverse
      • Golden Gateway
      • Guardian First
      • HECM
      • JB Nutter
      • Liberty Reverse
      • Live Well Financial
      • LLS
      • MetLife
      • Quicken
      • Reverseit
      • Seattle Mortgage
      • Security One
      • Sun West
      • Virtual Bank
      • Wells Fargo
    • Rates
    • Retirement
    • Reverse Mortgage
    • Reverse Mortgage Jobs
    • Senior Housing
    • Servicers
      • Celink
      • RMS
    • Technology
      • Bay Docs
      • Mortgage Cadence
      • Reverse Vision
    • Top HECM Lenders
    • Training
    • Video
    • Warehouse Lines
  • RSS




« FinCEN Forms Partnership to Combat Emerging Reverse Mortgage Fraud Says Director
Security One Forms Strategic Technology Relationship With Reverse Fortunes »

Poll: Are Reverse Mortgages Too Cheap?

February 22nd, 2010  |  by John Yedinak Published in News, Reverse Mortgage  |  6 Comments

image Money Rates contributor Andrew Freiburghouse poses a good question to readers, Are HECM Reverse Mortgages Too Cheap?

Pointing to Jack Guttentag’s More Bogus Arguments Against the Reverse Mortgage:

Typically, excessive costs are described as the most negative thing about taking out a reverse mortgage. But Guttentag nicely reverses the thinking on that point, wondering aloud if HECM costs are not actually too low to cover the exposure of the FHA that backs this loan.

There has yet to be a sustainable private product that provides anywhere near the benefits of the HECM, does that mean the loan is too cheap?

Putting politics and/or any personal beliefs and look at it from a cost perspective. Vote below.


Sign up to receive free updates like this by email or subscribe by RSS feed. Thanks for reading!

  • Share this:
Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post
    Related Posts
  • Nightly Business Report: Reverse Mortgage Feature
  • Fidelity: Retirees Will Face $240,000 in Health Care Costs
  • Social Security Funds to Be Exhausted by 2037



  • http://www.examiner.com/x-24506-Tampa-Elder-Care-Examiner Kevin McNichol

    There are other ways to lower fees. How many states eliminate intangible taxes and doc stamps on RM's? If we did that in Florida total upfront fees would be lower by about 25%.

  • The_Critic

    The primary purpose of the FHA insurance is not to protect the consumer; it was to allow lenders to provide reverse mortgages with higher ratios of available proceeds to maximum claim amounts, lower interest rates to consumers than would otherwise be available based on the true risk of this product while at the same time demanding that the loan be nonrecourse with no FICO score or income minimum requirements.

    However, HECMs were designed to be overall zero profit/loss based products. HUD/FHA believes it still is. That means in some years there will net profits and in others, net losses — but overall the net losses should offset the net profits over the life of the program.

    The beginning of the problems for the HECM itself began with HERA when it was required to be reclassed from GI to the MMI category. Next came the attacks of this Administration on the historical appreciation rates used in computing the subsidy request.

    If the MIP costs needed to be adjusted upward one would expect the suggestion to come out of HUD instead of the Administration. Now Mr. Guggentag who is no expert on this product is now over relying on the opinion of a former Wharton student to state that the HECM should have higher costs. I do not subscribe to that opinion.

  • bohemiajoe

    The people that truly need a reverse mortgage do so as a survival mechanism. The loan is a high risk loan to the lender. The program allows seniors to use their homes equity to sustain themselves thus maintaining independence and pride. This is NOT an entitlement program and saves the taxpayer from increased cost from people who need gov assistance and the families of seniors from the financial burden of assisting them. The costs of the loan should be able to sustain the program, for people who can't meet the guidelines there should be gov programs to help fill the shortfall gaps.

  • Linden

    I already brought this up to my 2 FL state reps and the governor, and they couldn't be bothered. Only one replied, sayign that “she was aware that there were may seniors in her district”, but went no further, and the others just didn't respond at all.

  • KatyDog

    Excellent comments—-as usual. The only problem is that those in Washington responsible for programs like this can't read so therefore will not see your thoughts. Something must be done to have our voices heard.
    I always what rock the AARP is hiding under, since I have seen nothing from them lately regarding RM.

  • tishman

    Are you kidding me? All I ever heard is “A Reverse Mortgage is an Expensive Loan” When the closing costs are equal to 15% of the principal amount, and the borrower gets charged interest against this amount, wow!
    And now wait until interest rates go up to say an historical average of 5%, all of the current adjustable loans will be paying 8-9% yearly on their accumulating outstanding balance. How anyone could say this loan is cheap must be smoking something real good/bad or just looking at the current rate with absolutely no understanding of the overall picture.
    What a bummer that we have to endure B.S. like this.
    You need to write to your congressmen.
    <Ahref=”http://www.fhareversemortgagesofsouthflorida.com>reversemortgagessouthfloridaFHAhud

.

Daily news on the reverse mortgage industry delivered to your inbox.



Wholesale Lender Sponsors







Sponsors






Exclusive Training Provider







RSS Reverse Mortgage Jobs

  • Reverse Mortgage Underwriter
  • MetLife Reverse Mortgage Professionals Wanted
  • Reverse Mortgage Consultant
  • Reverse Mortgage Consultant
  • Reverse Originator
  • Loan Officer
  • Reverse Mortgage Originator Virginia
  • Reverse Mortgage Originator Maryland

Recent Articles

  • Silvergate Grows Reverse Mortgage Business for Near-Record Earnings
  • CFPB To Mortgage Originators: We Hear Your Compensation Concerns
  • CNBC: Trade in Bills for Monthy Checks—Reverse Mortgages Rediscovered
  • Recession Leads to Loss of Retirement Hope, 43% Have No Savings Plan
  • Lenders Shift from Kitchen Table, Adapt to New Reverse Mortgage Landscape
  • Cantor Fitzgerald Presents Reverse Mortgage “Mythbuster”
  • Reverse Mortgage Industry Seeks QRM Definition from CFPB

Popular Posts

  • CFPB To Propose "Problematic" Compensation Rule For Reverse Mortgages?
  • Are Reverse Mortgages the New Key To Long Term Care at Home?
  • Lenders Shift from Kitchen Table, Adapt to New Reverse Mortgage Landscape
  • Cantor Fitzgerald Presents Reverse Mortgage "Mythbuster"
  • CBS Local News: Reverse Mortgages Work Well, With Caution


Our Sites

Long Term Care Daily

Senior Housing News

Home Health Care News


©2012 Reverse Mortgage Daily
Powered by WordPress using the Gridline Lite theme by Graph Paper Press.