<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Virtual Bank Returns to Reverse Mortgage Business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2010/02/08/virtual-bank-returns-to-reverse-mortgage-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2010/02/08/virtual-bank-returns-to-reverse-mortgage-business/</link>
	<description>Reverse Mortgage News and Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 06:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2010/02/08/virtual-bank-returns-to-reverse-mortgage-business/comment-page-1/#comment-39042</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2010/02/08/virtual-bank-returns-to-reverse-mortgage-business/#comment-39042</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget that Genworth is now paying more than 2% as well on their fixed HECM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget that Genworth is now paying more than 2% as well on their fixed HECM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blue_pencil</title>
		<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2010/02/08/virtual-bank-returns-to-reverse-mortgage-business/comment-page-1/#comment-36182</link>
		<dc:creator>blue_pencil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2010/02/08/virtual-bank-returns-to-reverse-mortgage-business/#comment-36182</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget that Genworth is now paying more than 2% as well on their fixed HECM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#39;t forget that Genworth is now paying more than 2% as well on their fixed HECM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jsmaldone</title>
		<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2010/02/08/virtual-bank-returns-to-reverse-mortgage-business/comment-page-1/#comment-36165</link>
		<dc:creator>jsmaldone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2010/02/08/virtual-bank-returns-to-reverse-mortgage-business/#comment-36165</guid>
		<description>Congradulations Al. I wish you all the luck in the world my friend.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Take care,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;John Smaldone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congradulations Al. I wish you all the luck in the world my friend.</p>
<p>Take care,</p>
<p>John Smaldone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RMresearcher</title>
		<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2010/02/08/virtual-bank-returns-to-reverse-mortgage-business/comment-page-1/#comment-36164</link>
		<dc:creator>RMresearcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2010/02/08/virtual-bank-returns-to-reverse-mortgage-business/#comment-36164</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t think Ginnie would be able to or want to keep track of those who had Issuer approval with limitation.  I suppose I could be incorrect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#39;t think Ginnie would be able to or want to keep track of those who had Issuer approval with limitation.  I suppose I could be incorrect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reversemaniac</title>
		<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2010/02/08/virtual-bank-returns-to-reverse-mortgage-business/comment-page-1/#comment-36163</link>
		<dc:creator>reversemaniac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2010/02/08/virtual-bank-returns-to-reverse-mortgage-business/#comment-36163</guid>
		<description>It is my understanding that Celink is &quot;technically&quot; approved as an HMBS Issuer, but they are limited to being an HMBS subservicer (Subcontract Servicer), and Participation Agent. In other words, they cannot be an &quot;active&quot; HMBS Issuer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is my understanding that Celink is &#8220;technically&#8221; approved as an HMBS Issuer, but they are limited to being an HMBS subservicer (Subcontract Servicer), and Participation Agent. In other words, they cannot be an &#8220;active&#8221; HMBS Issuer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RMresearcher</title>
		<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2010/02/08/virtual-bank-returns-to-reverse-mortgage-business/comment-page-1/#comment-36162</link>
		<dc:creator>RMresearcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2010/02/08/virtual-bank-returns-to-reverse-mortgage-business/#comment-36162</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t GNMA recently approve Celink, the servicer, as an issuer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#39;t GNMA recently approve Celink, the servicer, as an issuer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reversemaniac</title>
		<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2010/02/08/virtual-bank-returns-to-reverse-mortgage-business/comment-page-1/#comment-36161</link>
		<dc:creator>reversemaniac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2010/02/08/virtual-bank-returns-to-reverse-mortgage-business/#comment-36161</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think Ginnie Mae has approved an Issuer in over a year. While there are a lot of frustrated lenders that want to get involved in the HMBS program, I for one am glad that GNMA is taking it&#039;s time to get it right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t think Ginnie Mae has approved an Issuer in over a year. While there are a lot of frustrated lenders that want to get involved in the HMBS program, I for one am glad that GNMA is taking it&#39;s time to get it right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ReverseGuy</title>
		<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2010/02/08/virtual-bank-returns-to-reverse-mortgage-business/comment-page-1/#comment-36155</link>
		<dc:creator>ReverseGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2010/02/08/virtual-bank-returns-to-reverse-mortgage-business/#comment-36155</guid>
		<description>It will be interesting to see how this re-entry into the reverse marketplace plays out for them.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Seems a bit aggressive to jump in to the HMBS program that quickly...but no one ever accused Virtual Bank of not being aggressive with their business plans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be interesting to see how this re-entry into the reverse marketplace plays out for them.  </p>
<p>Seems a bit aggressive to jump in to the HMBS program that quickly&#8230;but no one ever accused Virtual Bank of not being aggressive with their business plans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 20/31 queries in 0.034 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Rackspace Cloud Files: c311757.r57.cf1.rackcdn.com

Served from: reversemortgagedaily.com @ 2012-05-26 15:06:19 -->
