Comments on: Reverse Mortgage Legislation Update – February 4, 2010 http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2010/02/04/reverse-mortgage-legislation-update-february-4-2010/ Reverse Mortgage News and Information Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:11:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Anonymous http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2010/02/04/reverse-mortgage-legislation-update-february-4-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-38791 Anonymous Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:35:00 +0000 http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2010/02/04/reverse-mortgage-legislation-update-february-4-2010/#comment-38791 Reva,rnrnThank you for the heads up on HR 4419. We in California are currently working on fixing AB 329 through a partial revival of SB 660. It will be interesting to read the federal proposal in light of the problems with AB 329. Hopefully this bill solves the counseling funding and responsibility issues that are unresolved here. I hope it also solves the distribution issue related to the required notice problem. It will also be interesting to see if it applies to HECMs only.rnrnAgain thanks for the heads up. Reva,rnrnThank you for the heads up on HR 4419. We in California are currently working on fixing AB 329 through a partial revival of SB 660. It will be interesting to read the federal proposal in light of the problems with AB 329. Hopefully this bill solves the counseling funding and responsibility issues that are unresolved here. I hope it also solves the distribution issue related to the required notice problem. It will also be interesting to see if it applies to HECMs only.rnrnAgain thanks for the heads up.

]]> By: James_E_Veale_CPA_MBT http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2010/02/04/reverse-mortgage-legislation-update-february-4-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-36126 James_E_Veale_CPA_MBT Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:35:04 +0000 http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2010/02/04/reverse-mortgage-legislation-update-february-4-2010/#comment-36126 Reva,<br><br>Thank you for the heads up on HR 4419. We in California are currently working on fixing AB 329 through a partial revival of SB 660. It will be interesting to read the federal proposal in light of the problems with AB 329. Hopefully this bill solves the counseling funding and responsibility issues that are unresolved here. I hope it also solves the distribution issue related to the required notice problem. It will also be interesting to see if it applies to HECMs only.<br><br>Again thanks for the heads up. Reva,

Thank you for the heads up on HR 4419. We in California are currently working on fixing AB 329 through a partial revival of SB 660. It will be interesting to read the federal proposal in light of the problems with AB 329. Hopefully this bill solves the counseling funding and responsibility issues that are unresolved here. I hope it also solves the distribution issue related to the required notice problem. It will also be interesting to see if it applies to HECMs only.

Again thanks for the heads up.

]]> By: Anonymous http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2010/02/04/reverse-mortgage-legislation-update-february-4-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-44440 Anonymous Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2010/02/04/reverse-mortgage-legislation-update-february-4-2010/#comment-44440 Reva,rnrnThank you for the heads up on HR 4419. We in California are currently working on fixing AB 329 through a partial revival of SB 660. It will be interesting to read the federal proposal in light of the problems with AB 329. Hopefully this bill solves the counseling funding and responsibility issues that are unresolved here. I hope it also solves the distribution issue related to the required notice problem. It will also be interesting to see if it applies to HECMs only.rnrnAgain thanks for the heads up. Reva,rnrnThank you for the heads up on HR 4419. We in California are currently working on fixing AB 329 through a partial revival of SB 660. It will be interesting to read the federal proposal in light of the problems with AB 329. Hopefully this bill solves the counseling funding and responsibility issues that are unresolved here. I hope it also solves the distribution issue related to the required notice problem. It will also be interesting to see if it applies to HECMs only.rnrnAgain thanks for the heads up.

]]>