Reverse Mortgage Daily

  • Home
  • About
  • Wholesale Lenders
  • Jobs
  • Awards
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Data
  • Content
  • Categories
    • Alternatives
      • EquityKey
      • REX
    • American Advisors Group
    • Chart of the Day
    • Commentary
    • Counseling
    • Data
    • Events
    • FHA
    • GNMA
    • Gov. Updates
    • International
    • Interview Series
    • Jumbo Products
    • Leads
    • Legislation
    • Lenders
    • Live Well
    • Marketing
    • MBA Reverse
    • News
    • NRMLA
    • Podcast
    • Products
      • 1st Reverse
      • Bank of America
      • Countrywide
      • Financial Freedom
      • FNMA Homekeeper
      • Generation Mortgage
      • Gold Reverse
      • Golden Gateway
      • Guardian First
      • HECM
      • JB Nutter
      • Liberty Reverse
      • Live Well Financial
      • LLS
      • MetLife
      • Quicken
      • Reverseit
      • Seattle Mortgage
      • Security One
      • Sun West
      • Virtual Bank
      • Wells Fargo
    • Rates
    • Retirement
    • Reverse Mortgage
    • Reverse Mortgage Jobs
    • Senior Housing
    • Servicers
      • Celink
      • RMS
    • Technology
      • Bay Docs
      • Mortgage Cadence
      • Reverse Vision
    • Top HECM Lenders
    • Training
    • Video
    • Warehouse Lines
  • RSS



« Parent Company of Financial Freedom Acquires Another Bank from FDIC
Differing Strategies on Reverse Mortgage Legislation »

FHA Anticipates Policy Changes to Address Quality of Existing Portfolio

December 21st, 2009  |  by John Yedinak Published in FHA, News, Reverse Mortgage  |  7 Comments

The Federal Housing Administration (FHA) expects to introduce new policy changes to the market around the end of January, 2010 said David Stevens, Assistant Secretary for Housing and FHA Commissioner in a letter sent to lenders and correspondents last week.

The policies under consideration are intended to address the quality of the existing portfolio, improve the performance of future books of business and will help to return the capital reserve to above the legislated 2 percent level.

“We cannot comment on implementation time lines until decisions have been reached on new policies or policy changes and the manner in which they will be introduced,” said Stevens.  “However, as part of our process of exploring policy options, we will reach out to many industry players to better understand operational impacts in order to best assess a fair implementation time line.”

In November, an independent actuarial study found FHA’s capital reserves were well below the 2 percent required by law.

A separate independent study released the same day on FHA’s reverse mortgage program found the HECM portfolio was performing well.  

David Stevens Letter

Technorati Tags: Reverse Mortgage,HECM,FHA,HUD

Sign up to receive free updates like this by email or subscribe by RSS feed. Thanks for reading!

  • Share this:

Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post
    Related Posts
  • Value of FHA’s Reverse Mortgage Portfolio Will Continue to Increase Says Study
  • FHA Proposes Additional Program Changes to Boost Capital Reserves
  • New Credit Requirements for FHA Borrowers



  • John

    Is FHA going to ever learn? Stop lending to people who should not be homeowners. It is unfortunate to see the reverse mortgage program take the hit for the mismanagement of the FHA. Or increase the MIP homeowners pay who take out a 'forward' FHA loan if so many are going into default

  • The_Critic

    John,

    What hit to the HECM program do you make reference? You obviously have insight into something the rest of us do not. Please advise.

  • ReverseGuy

    Critic,

    I think it's pretty clear what John (and the FHA) is saying.

    “The policies under consideration are intended to address the quality of the existing portfolio, improve the performance of future books of business and will help to return the capital reserve to above the legislated 2 percent level.”

    While no one has specific information on this, it is pretty clear that the FHA will be making changes (more than likely negative ones) that will impact our industry. As John alluded to – possibly that means an increase in the MIP paid by borrowers..or maybe another PL factor decrease. Whatever it is, we can't assume that it will be good – recent actions taken (last PL decrease) by the FHA on this issue have shown us that pretty clearly.

  • REVGUYJIM

    Bottom line: making higher risk loans in an effort to extend the priviledge of homeownership beyond those who are truly credit-worthy is an expensive proposition, and somebody's got to pay for it.

  • The_Critic

    ReverseGuy,

    I cannot believe that I am the optimist on this issue.

    Based on HUD's own internal calculations, reducing the PL factors will do little to reduce any losses for the cohort of HECMs to be endorsed during the fiscal year 2010. Besides loweing PL factors only impacts capital some distant time in the future. Reducing PL factors does not provide gains; it just lowers losses. HUD estimated that the Administration's positive credit subsidy should have been a negative. When PL factors are high, reducing them lowers losses but each reduction thereafter, has a definite diminishing returns effect.

    Only raising MIP will give an immediate boost to total capital. Even a $1,000 increase to each HECM will provide less than $120 million in increased capital. I really do not see HUD going to HECMs for additional MIP unless this President or Congress place undue pressure on HUD to take this unwarranted step. Of course, this President did barge into a private meeting of other nations to tell them to drop it, so your guess is as good as mine….

  • mattneumeyer

    I've been given the impression by my managers that the next adjustment could happen on the “forward” side of the market. I've heard that they are likely to increase the down payment to 5% from 3.5%. Hopefully that corrects a large part of the problem and no further PL reductions are needed.

  • The_Critic

    Matt,

    When it comes to lowering HECM budget deficits, lowering principal limits is the best weapon. As a means to raising capital quickly, it is a very poor means.

    To raise capital qucikly, one needs to raise it. The most effective way to do that is by increasing the MIP.

    Not being an alarmist, the way to do this effectively is by raising the MIP on forward mortgages.

.


Wholesale Lender Sponsors





Sponsors






Exclusive Training Provider







RSS Reverse Mortgage Jobs

  • Retail Sales Manager
  • Reverse Mortgage Consultant
  • Reverse Mortgage Consultant
  • Reverse Mortgage Consultant
  • Reverse Mortgage Consultant
  • Reverse Mortgage Branch Manager
  • Reverse Mortgage Consultant
  • Fed Charter Now Hiring Reverse LO's Nationally

Recent Articles

  • Are You Compliant? State Regulators Release SAFE Act Examination Guidelines
  • Ron Paul: The CFPB Will Harm Consumers
  • Social Media Marketing for Reverse Mortgages: Worth The Risks?
  • Bank Supervisors Set Sights on Uniform Loan Officer State Test
  • New Rule Requires all Non-Bank Mortgage Lenders File Fraud Reports
  • Wendover Hires Former B of A, Financial Freedom Reverse Mortgage Execs
  • The “Brave New World” of Reverse Mortgage Lenders—What’s in Store

Popular Posts

  • Financial Assessment Leads to Reverse Mortgage Musical Chairs
  • Google Shuts Down Mortgage Rate Comparison Tool
  • CFPB Begins Mortgage Audits. What Can Lenders Expect?
  • Wendover Hires Former B of A, Financial Freedom Reverse Mortgage Execs
  • LA Times: Reverse Mortgage May Be Best Option


Our Sites

Long Term Care Daily

Senior Housing News


©2012 Reverse Mortgage Daily
Powered by WordPress using the Gridline Lite theme by Graph Paper Press.