<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New York Reverse Mortgage Legislation Becomes Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/11/30/new-york-reverse-mortgage-legislation-becomes-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/11/30/new-york-reverse-mortgage-legislation-becomes-law/</link>
	<description>Reverse Mortgage News and Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: edoconnor</title>
		<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/11/30/new-york-reverse-mortgage-legislation-becomes-law/comment-page-1/#comment-35259</link>
		<dc:creator>edoconnor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/11/30/new-york-reverse-mortgage-legislation-becomes-law/#comment-35259</guid>
		<description>Gee - posturing politicians?  Maybe someone can explain why we needed a law to already explain what is in the law&gt;  RM proceeds are not income, already covered under the real property law. Deductions for income and taxation of investment dividends are already covered by the IRS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee &#8211; posturing politicians?  Maybe someone can explain why we needed a law to already explain what is in the law&gt;  RM proceeds are not income, already covered under the real property law. Deductions for income and taxation of investment dividends are already covered by the IRS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

