<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HUD Issues Guidance for Subordinate Lien Financing Under the HECM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/11/24/hud-issues-guidance-for-subordinate-lien-financing-under-the-hecm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/11/24/hud-issues-guidance-for-subordinate-lien-financing-under-the-hecm/</link>
	<description>Reverse Mortgage News and Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 06:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rainmand</title>
		<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/11/24/hud-issues-guidance-for-subordinate-lien-financing-under-the-hecm/comment-page-1/#comment-38270</link>
		<dc:creator>rainmand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 20:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/11/24/hud-issues-guidance-for-subordinate-lien-financing-under-the-hecm/#comment-38270</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve re-read the Mortgage Letter several times and the key words are &quot;in connection with the transaction&quot;.  The example in the Mortagee Letter supports those key words with the example, whereas the borrower needs to obtaining &quot;new&quot; subordinate financing to enable the HECM to work - not pre-existing financing.rnrnThat clearly says a pre-existing second lien can be subordinated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve re-read the Mortgage Letter several times and the key words are &#8220;in connection with the transaction&#8221;.  The example in the Mortagee Letter supports those key words with the example, whereas the borrower needs to obtaining &#8220;new&#8221; subordinate financing to enable the HECM to work &#8211; not pre-existing financing.rnrnThat clearly says a pre-existing second lien can be subordinated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rainmand</title>
		<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/11/24/hud-issues-guidance-for-subordinate-lien-financing-under-the-hecm/comment-page-1/#comment-34963</link>
		<dc:creator>rainmand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/11/24/hud-issues-guidance-for-subordinate-lien-financing-under-the-hecm/#comment-34963</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve re-read the Mortgage Letter several times and the key words are &quot;in connection with the transaction&quot;.  The example in the Mortagee Letter supports those key words with the example, whereas the borrower needs to obtaining &quot;new&quot; subordinate financing to enable the HECM to work - not pre-existing financing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That clearly says a pre-existing second lien can be subordinated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve re-read the Mortgage Letter several times and the key words are &#8220;in connection with the transaction&#8221;.  The example in the Mortagee Letter supports those key words with the example, whereas the borrower needs to obtaining &#8220;new&#8221; subordinate financing to enable the HECM to work &#8211; not pre-existing financing.</p>
<p>That clearly says a pre-existing second lien can be subordinated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Hulbert</title>
		<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/11/24/hud-issues-guidance-for-subordinate-lien-financing-under-the-hecm/comment-page-1/#comment-38271</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Hulbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 16:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/11/24/hud-issues-guidance-for-subordinate-lien-financing-under-the-hecm/#comment-38271</guid>
		<description>In the case written by Mr. Kelly, the lender to whom my firm delivered the loan approved the loan because there was not a new second lien established in connection with the reverse mortgage.  There was an existing second lien held by a bank who executed a subordination agreement whereby they agreed to take a subordinate position behind the first and second liens created by the HECM.rnrnPast guidance clearly stated that no NEW subordinate financing could be created in conjunction with the HECM transaction.  In our borrower&#039;s case there was no new financing, rather an existing lienholder agreed to subordinate.rnrnThe guidance issued in ML 2009-49 appears to change HUD&#039;s previous stance with regards to existing subordinate liens. However, many individuals in the industry would appreciate clarification from HUD that ML 2009-49 does in fact clearly prohibit ANY subordinate financing in conjunction with the HECM, be it existing or new.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the case written by Mr. Kelly, the lender to whom my firm delivered the loan approved the loan because there was not a new second lien established in connection with the reverse mortgage.  There was an existing second lien held by a bank who executed a subordination agreement whereby they agreed to take a subordinate position behind the first and second liens created by the HECM.rnrnPast guidance clearly stated that no NEW subordinate financing could be created in conjunction with the HECM transaction.  In our borrower&#8217;s case there was no new financing, rather an existing lienholder agreed to subordinate.rnrnThe guidance issued in ML 2009-49 appears to change HUD&#8217;s previous stance with regards to existing subordinate liens. However, many individuals in the industry would appreciate clarification from HUD that ML 2009-49 does in fact clearly prohibit ANY subordinate financing in conjunction with the HECM, be it existing or new.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Hulbert</title>
		<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/11/24/hud-issues-guidance-for-subordinate-lien-financing-under-the-hecm/comment-page-1/#comment-34961</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Hulbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 14:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/11/24/hud-issues-guidance-for-subordinate-lien-financing-under-the-hecm/#comment-34961</guid>
		<description>In the case written by Mr. Kelly, the lender to whom my firm delivered the loan approved the loan because there was not a new second lien established in connection with the reverse mortgage.  There was an existing second lien held by a bank who executed a subordination agreement whereby they agreed to take a subordinate position behind the first and second liens created by the HECM.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Past guidance clearly stated that no NEW subordinate financing could be created in conjunction with the HECM transaction.  In our borrower&#039;s case there was no new financing, rather an existing lienholder agreed to subordinate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The guidance issued in ML 2009-49 appears to change HUD&#039;s previous stance with regards to existing subordinate liens. However, many individuals in the industry would appreciate clarification from HUD that ML 2009-49 does in fact clearly prohibit ANY subordinate financing in conjunction with the HECM, be it existing or new.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the case written by Mr. Kelly, the lender to whom my firm delivered the loan approved the loan because there was not a new second lien established in connection with the reverse mortgage.  There was an existing second lien held by a bank who executed a subordination agreement whereby they agreed to take a subordinate position behind the first and second liens created by the HECM.</p>
<p>Past guidance clearly stated that no NEW subordinate financing could be created in conjunction with the HECM transaction.  In our borrower&#39;s case there was no new financing, rather an existing lienholder agreed to subordinate.</p>
<p>The guidance issued in ML 2009-49 appears to change HUD&#39;s previous stance with regards to existing subordinate liens. However, many individuals in the industry would appreciate clarification from HUD that ML 2009-49 does in fact clearly prohibit ANY subordinate financing in conjunction with the HECM, be it existing or new.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Kritzer</title>
		<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/11/24/hud-issues-guidance-for-subordinate-lien-financing-under-the-hecm/comment-page-1/#comment-34933</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Kritzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 15:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/11/24/hud-issues-guidance-for-subordinate-lien-financing-under-the-hecm/#comment-34933</guid>
		<description>While the letter was ambiguous, I think it specifically forbids NEW subordinated financing, rather than EXISTING second liens. In the case of Mr. Kelly&#039;s story, then, it seems as if this was perfectly legal. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You can read my full analysis here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reversemortgage.net/confusion-over-subordinate-financing-in-reverse-mortgages/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.reversemortgage.net/confusion-over-s...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the letter was ambiguous, I think it specifically forbids NEW subordinated financing, rather than EXISTING second liens. In the case of Mr. Kelly&#39;s story, then, it seems as if this was perfectly legal. </p>
<p>You can read my full analysis here:<br /><a href="http://www.reversemortgage.net/confusion-over-subordinate-financing-in-reverse-mortgages/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.reversemortgage.net/confusion-over-s" rel="nofollow">http://www.reversemortgage.net/confusion-over-s</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James_E_Veale_CPA_MBT</title>
		<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/11/24/hud-issues-guidance-for-subordinate-lien-financing-under-the-hecm/comment-page-1/#comment-34793</link>
		<dc:creator>James_E_Veale_CPA_MBT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 04:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/11/24/hud-issues-guidance-for-subordinate-lien-financing-under-the-hecm/#comment-34793</guid>
		<description>REVGUYJIM,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A few days ago, Admin cited a story written by a genuine friend to this industry, Mr. Tom Kelly.  He is a good writer but hardly an authority on HECMs.  Mr. Kelly wrote a story based on a loan provided by the firm Mrs. Sarah Hulbert works for.  Mrs. Hulbert is a former NRMLA chairwoman.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is no way that HUD would allow a second mortgage.  HUD must have the second lien.  The existing second referred to the story could have become a third.  I hope RMD will interview Mrs. Hulbert and provide a clear summary of the facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>REVGUYJIM,</p>
<p>A few days ago, Admin cited a story written by a genuine friend to this industry, Mr. Tom Kelly.  He is a good writer but hardly an authority on HECMs.  Mr. Kelly wrote a story based on a loan provided by the firm Mrs. Sarah Hulbert works for.  Mrs. Hulbert is a former NRMLA chairwoman.</p>
<p>There is no way that HUD would allow a second mortgage.  HUD must have the second lien.  The existing second referred to the story could have become a third.  I hope RMD will interview Mrs. Hulbert and provide a clear summary of the facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Admin</title>
		<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/11/24/hud-issues-guidance-for-subordinate-lien-financing-under-the-hecm/comment-page-1/#comment-34775</link>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/11/24/hud-issues-guidance-for-subordinate-lien-financing-under-the-hecm/#comment-34775</guid>
		<description>Louise,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m investigating more on this topic, will keep everyone posted.  If anyone has any insight please share.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Louise,</p>
<p>I&#39;m investigating more on this topic, will keep everyone posted.  If anyone has any insight please share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louise321</title>
		<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/11/24/hud-issues-guidance-for-subordinate-lien-financing-under-the-hecm/comment-page-1/#comment-34774</link>
		<dc:creator>Louise321</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/11/24/hud-issues-guidance-for-subordinate-lien-financing-under-the-hecm/#comment-34774</guid>
		<description>Was the loan in some of the stories I&#039;ve read subordinated to a HECM or a proprietary loan?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was the loan in some of the stories I&#39;ve read subordinated to a HECM or a proprietary loan?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 20/31 queries in 0.066 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Rackspace Cloud Files: c311757.r57.cf1.rackcdn.com

Served from: reversemortgagedaily.com @ 2012-05-26 14:26:58 -->
