Reverse Mortgage Daily

  • Home
  • About
  • Wholesale Lenders
  • Jobs
  • Awards
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Data
  • Content
  • Categories
    • Alternatives
      • EquityKey
      • REX
    • American Advisors Group
    • Chart of the Day
    • Commentary
    • Counseling
    • Data
    • Events
    • FHA
    • GNMA
    • Gov. Updates
    • International
    • Interview Series
    • Jumbo Products
    • Leads
    • Legislation
    • Lenders
    • Live Well
    • Marketing
    • MBA Reverse
    • News
    • NRMLA
    • Podcast
    • Products
      • 1st Reverse
      • Bank of America
      • Countrywide
      • Financial Freedom
      • FNMA Homekeeper
      • Generation Mortgage
      • Gold Reverse
      • Golden Gateway
      • Guardian First
      • HECM
      • JB Nutter
      • Liberty Reverse
      • Live Well Financial
      • LLS
      • MetLife
      • Quicken
      • Reverseit
      • Seattle Mortgage
      • Security One
      • Sun West
      • Virtual Bank
      • Wells Fargo
    • Rates
    • Retirement
    • Reverse Mortgage
    • Reverse Mortgage Jobs
    • Senior Housing
    • Servicers
      • Celink
      • RMS
    • Technology
      • Bay Docs
      • Mortgage Cadence
      • Reverse Vision
    • Top HECM Lenders
    • Training
    • Video
    • Warehouse Lines
  • RSS



« Lender Subordinates Loan for Senior to Make Reverse Mortgage Work
Sponsored Podcast: Meg Burns Preps Industry for Change at NRMLA Conference »

First Mariner Bank May Sell Reverse Mortgage Division

November 20th, 2009  |  by John Yedinak Published in News, Reverse Mortgage  |  4 Comments

image First Mariner Bank entered into a profit sharing agreement with a private company related to its reverse mortgage division Next Generation Financial Services (NGFS) and may result in the acquisition of NGFS if certain requirements are satisfied within the next 18 months. 

According to a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission:

The closing of the transaction is subject to numerous conditions, including, without limitation, that the parties obtain consents and approvals from certain lenders and governmental agencies that license and supervise the Bank.  Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the closing will occur when expected, if at all.  The Bank does not anticipate any benefit that results from the sale to be material.

While the 10-Q doesn’t state who the private company is, RMD learned earlier this month that LTC Global increased its investment to a majority share in NGFS.

Also, Robert Cannon was named as NGFS’s Chief Executive Officer earlier this week.

Technorati Tags: Reverse Mortgage,News,HECM,FHA,HUD,First Mariner,NGFS

Sign up to receive free updates like this by email or subscribe by RSS feed. Thanks for reading!

  • Share this:

Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post
    Related Posts
  • Parent Company of Reverse Mortgage Lender Looks to Raise $20 Million
  • LTC Global Increases Investment in Reverse Mortgage Lender, Names New President
  • LTC Global Acquires Another Reverse Mortgage Company



  • JS

    Here is the answer to my question from the post on they yesterday. They now have a “Profit Sharing Agreement” aka referral fee, while they get licensed for the next 18 months.

  • The_Critic

    JS,

    Are you implying there is something wrong with this arrangement? It sure looks that way.

  • JS

    As I stated in another post, as far as I know if a subsidiary is not majority owned and controlled by the licensed parent company they are not able to put themselves out there as a mortgage lender/broker and they are not able to receive profits from the origination of reverse mortgages. If I am wrong then please let me know. If I am correct then they are marketing themselves (NGFS) as a mortgage lender but they are unlicensed which is clearly illegal. I do not see much of a difference between this and me going to my referral partners and setting up a joint venture that allows a profit sharing arrangement.

  • JS

    As I stated in another post, as far as I know if a subsidiary is not majority owned and controlled by the licensed parent company they are not able to put themselves out there as a mortgage lender/broker and they are not able to receive profits from the origination of reverse mortgages. If I am wrong then please let me know. If I am correct then they are marketing themselves (NGFS) as a mortgage lender but they are unlicensed which is clearly illegal. I do not see much of a difference between this and me going to my referral partners and setting up a joint venture that allows a profit sharing arrangement.rnrn

.


Wholesale Lender Sponsors





Sponsors






Exclusive Training Provider







RSS Reverse Mortgage Jobs

  • Retail Sales Manager
  • Reverse Mortgage Consultant
  • Reverse Mortgage Consultant
  • Reverse Mortgage Consultant
  • Reverse Mortgage Consultant
  • Reverse Mortgage Branch Manager
  • Reverse Mortgage Consultant
  • Fed Charter Now Hiring Reverse LO's Nationally

Recent Articles

  • House Bill Aims to Save FHA Mortgage Insurance Fund in “Crisis”
  • Are You Compliant? State Regulators Release SAFE Act Examination Guidelines
  • Ron Paul: The CFPB Will Harm Consumers
  • Social Media Marketing for Reverse Mortgages: Worth The Risks?
  • Bank Supervisors Set Sights on Uniform Loan Officer State Test
  • New Rule Requires all Non-Bank Mortgage Lenders File Fraud Reports
  • Wendover Hires Former B of A, Financial Freedom Reverse Mortgage Execs

Popular Posts

  • Financial Assessment Leads to Reverse Mortgage Musical Chairs
  • Google Shuts Down Mortgage Rate Comparison Tool
  • CFPB Begins Mortgage Audits. What Can Lenders Expect?
  • Wendover Hires Former B of A, Financial Freedom Reverse Mortgage Execs
  • LA Times: Reverse Mortgage May Be Best Option


Our Sites

Long Term Care Daily

Senior Housing News


©2012 Reverse Mortgage Daily
Powered by WordPress using the Gridline Lite theme by Graph Paper Press.