<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Value of FHA&#8217;s Reverse Mortgage Portfolio Will Continue to Increase Says Study</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/11/12/value-of-fhas-reverse-mortgage-portfolio-will-continue-to-increase-says-study/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/11/12/value-of-fhas-reverse-mortgage-portfolio-will-continue-to-increase-says-study/</link>
	<description>Reverse Mortgage News and Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:15:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/11/12/value-of-fhas-reverse-mortgage-portfolio-will-continue-to-increase-says-study/comment-page-1/#comment-39040</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/11/12/value-of-fhas-reverse-mortgage-portfolio-will-continue-to-increase-says-study/#comment-39040</guid>
		<description>Sure made headlines when it was estimated that MIP reserves were inadequate for the 2009/2010 book of business.  Why no positive headlines on this great news?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure made headlines when it was estimated that MIP reserves were inadequate for the 2009/2010 book of business.  Why no positive headlines on this great news?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lancejackson</title>
		<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/11/12/value-of-fhas-reverse-mortgage-portfolio-will-continue-to-increase-says-study/comment-page-1/#comment-34643</link>
		<dc:creator>lancejackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/11/12/value-of-fhas-reverse-mortgage-portfolio-will-continue-to-increase-says-study/#comment-34643</guid>
		<description>Sure made headlines when it was estimated that MIP reserves were inadequate for the 2009/2010 book of business.  Why no positive headlines on this great news?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure made headlines when it was estimated that MIP reserves were inadequate for the 2009/2010 book of business.  Why no positive headlines on this great news?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James_E_Veale_CPA_MBT</title>
		<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/11/12/value-of-fhas-reverse-mortgage-portfolio-will-continue-to-increase-says-study/comment-page-1/#comment-34627</link>
		<dc:creator>James_E_Veale_CPA_MBT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/11/12/value-of-fhas-reverse-mortgage-portfolio-will-continue-to-increase-says-study/#comment-34627</guid>
		<description>I agree with Mr. Lunde.  OMB went over the top in forcing overly pessimistic appreciation rates into the HECM budget process.   &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why the Administration took this course of action may never be fully known.  Some have said it was a power play but who were the players?  Some have called it a realistic approach but by whose standards?  In some intra-governmental squabbling HUD has been accused of being too optimistic over home appreciation rates despite using third party estimates.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is still a glimmer of hope that Congress may reverse itself and provide a full subsidy.  Even a partial subsidy would help.  With some loans closed and many more on the verge of closing reflecting the lower PLFs, all we can do is hope this will be clarified soon.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Almost two months ago, some RMD readers opined that it was too late to write members of the Conference Committee over this bill.  In an article dated 9/21/2009, a reader listed the members of the committee in a comment identifying their political party affiliation and state of residence.  Since the bills conflict over funding the needed HECM subsidy, writing a calm, polite letter to these lawmakers requesting their support in helping our seniors is not meritless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Mr. Lunde.  OMB went over the top in forcing overly pessimistic appreciation rates into the HECM budget process.   </p>
<p>Why the Administration took this course of action may never be fully known.  Some have said it was a power play but who were the players?  Some have called it a realistic approach but by whose standards?  In some intra-governmental squabbling HUD has been accused of being too optimistic over home appreciation rates despite using third party estimates.</p>
<p>There is still a glimmer of hope that Congress may reverse itself and provide a full subsidy.  Even a partial subsidy would help.  With some loans closed and many more on the verge of closing reflecting the lower PLFs, all we can do is hope this will be clarified soon.</p>
<p>Almost two months ago, some RMD readers opined that it was too late to write members of the Conference Committee over this bill.  In an article dated 9/21/2009, a reader listed the members of the committee in a comment identifying their political party affiliation and state of residence.  Since the bills conflict over funding the needed HECM subsidy, writing a calm, polite letter to these lawmakers requesting their support in helping our seniors is not meritless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnklunde</title>
		<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/11/12/value-of-fhas-reverse-mortgage-portfolio-will-continue-to-increase-says-study/comment-page-1/#comment-34620</link>
		<dc:creator>johnklunde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/11/12/value-of-fhas-reverse-mortgage-portfolio-will-continue-to-increase-says-study/#comment-34620</guid>
		<description>Which might be another way of saying that this is what the analysis looks like without the &quot;modified&quot; home price appreciation assumptions used in the budget that resulted in a $798 million subsidy request that became the 10% principal limit reduction.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hard to say for certain, but the numbers seem about right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which might be another way of saying that this is what the analysis looks like without the &#8220;modified&#8221; home price appreciation assumptions used in the budget that resulted in a $798 million subsidy request that became the 10% principal limit reduction.</p>
<p>Hard to say for certain, but the numbers seem about right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
