Reverse Mortgage Daily

  • Home
  • About
  • Wholesale Lenders
  • Jobs
  • Awards
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Data
  • Content
  • Categories
    • Alternatives
      • EquityKey
      • REX
    • American Advisors Group
    • CFPB
    • Chart of the Day
    • Commentary
    • Counseling
    • Data
    • Events
    • FHA
    • GNMA
    • Gov. Updates
    • International
    • Interview Series
    • Jumbo Products
    • Leads
    • Legislation
    • Lenders
    • Live Well
    • Marketing
    • MBA Reverse
    • Moneyhouse
    • New Category
    • New York Life
    • News
    • NRMLA
    • Podcast
    • Products
      • 1st Reverse
      • Bank of America
      • Countrywide
      • Financial Freedom
      • FNMA Homekeeper
      • Generation Mortgage
      • Gold Reverse
      • Golden Gateway
      • Guardian First
      • HECM
      • JB Nutter
      • Liberty Reverse
      • Live Well Financial
      • LLS
      • MetLife
      • Quicken
      • Reverseit
      • Seattle Mortgage
      • Security One
      • Sun West
      • Virtual Bank
      • Wells Fargo
    • Rates
    • Retirement
    • Reverse Mortgage
    • Reverse Mortgage Jobs
    • Senior Housing
    • Servicers
      • Celink
      • RMS
    • Technology
      • Bay Docs
      • Mortgage Cadence
      • Reverse Vision
    • Top HECM Lenders
    • Training
    • Video
    • Warehouse Lines
  • RSS




« Reverse Mortgage: Trick Or Treat?
Congress Passes Extension of Higher Reverse Mortgage Loan Limits »

HUD Acts to Permanently Withdraw Reverse Mortgage Lender’s FHA Approval

October 30th, 2009  |  by John Yedinak Published in FHA, News, Reverse Mortgage  |  5 Comments

The US Department of Housing and Urban Development announced its Mortgagee Review Board (MRB) is proposing to permanently withdraw the HUD/FHA approval of Financial Mortgage USA, Inc., a reverse mortgage lender based in Honolulu, Hawaii.

HUD’s MRB alleges the Company failed to implement an FHA-required quality control plan; separate its lending operations from those of its affiliated insurance company; conform to prudent lending practices; and properly provide borrowers with housing counseling services.

Financial Mortgage USA (FMUSA) has 30 days to respond to the Board’s proposed withdrawal and seek a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge said a statement from HUD.

"FHA will not tolerate lenders who violate our rules and prey on those who depend on a reverse mortgage to continue to live independently," said FHA Commissioner David Stevens. "FHA-approved lenders must understand that we mean business when it comes to protecting the FHA insurance fund from those who cut corners and take advantage of unsuspecting senior citizens."

In addition, the MRB is imposing the maximum $97,500 civil money penalty available against the Company for these violations. A complaint seeking these civil money penalties will be served upon Financial Mortgage USA in due course and the lender will have 15 days to request a hearing on the imposition of these civil money penalties.

HUD’s proposed withdrawal action alleges that the Company violated HUD/FHA requirements by:

  • Failing to implement an independent Quality Control Plan, relying instead on its Vice President of Operations to conduct quality control reviews;
  • Failing to provide a clear and effective separation between itself and Estate Planners of America, an affiliated life insurance company; and
  • Failing to provide borrowers with a list of HUD-approved housing counseling agencies in the State of Hawaii, where they lived.

HUD’s statement also adds that:

By failing to maintain a clear and effective separation between its affiliated insurance company, HUD alleges that FMUSA confused elderly borrowers who could not tell with whom they were doing business.

FMUSA failed to discuss the options for receiving HECM proceeds with borrowers or simply ignored borrowers’ stated preferences in disbursing the HECM proceeds.

FMUSA and its affiliate, Estate Planners of America then duped the borrowers into purchasing annuities from Estate Planners of America, which borrowers did not request and did not understand had been purchased.

The Board was particularly concerned about one case in which the Company steered an 88-year-old borrower into purchasing an annuity which would not mature until she reached her 104th birthday.

According to HUD data, Financial Mortgage USA endorsed 14 HECMs in FY 2009.

Technorati Tags: Reverse Mortgage,News,HECM,FHA,HUD

Sign up to receive free updates like this by email or subscribe by RSS feed. Thanks for reading!

  • Share this:
Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post
    Related Posts
  • HUD Issues Notice of Violation Against FHA Lender for Fraud
  • FHA Bans Two More Lenders, Reaches Settlement With Others
  • FHA Permanently Bans New York Lender for Gross Violations



  • http://www.nrmlaonline.org Peter Bell

    Unfortunately, this is the type of story that gets picked up repeatedly by the press and gives our critics credability. I am glad to see that this firm was really a small player, having only 14 HECMs endorsed in 2009, and that they are not a NRMLA member.

    Other companies that might tolerate similar inappropriate cross-selling activities should be forewarned, HUD is taking a more aggressive stance to weed out the bad players from its programs.

  • HECM_Dude

    Perhaps those NRMLA members who still are engaged in illegal cross-selling now will understand that HUD means business.

  • Guest

    Perhaps those NRMLA members who still are engaged in illegal cross-selling now will understand that HUD means business.

  • rmhonolulu

    What's sad is that no one did anything about this company when it was doing business like this. And if you look closely, it was a NRMLA member for years! Unfortunately, there will always be unscrupulous business people out there…but, we have to try and encourage our clients and fellow reverse mortgage LO's to speak out when they hear of acts like these. And hope that organizations like NRMLA and the DCCA will listen and take action….

  • Anonymous

    What’s sad is that no one did anything about this company when it was doing business like this. And if you look closely, it was a NRMLA member for years! Unfortunately, there will always be unscrupulous business people out there…but, we have to try and encourage our clients and fellow reverse mortgage LO’s to speak out when they hear of acts like these. And hope that organizations like NRMLA and the DCCA will listen and take action….

.

Daily news on the reverse mortgage industry delivered to your inbox.



Wholesale Lender Sponsors







Sponsors






Exclusive Training Provider







RSS Reverse Mortgage Jobs

  • Reverse Mortgage Underwriter
  • MetLife Reverse Mortgage Professionals Wanted
  • Reverse Mortgage Consultant
  • Reverse Mortgage Consultant
  • Reverse Originator
  • Loan Officer
  • Reverse Mortgage Originator Virginia
  • Reverse Mortgage Originator Maryland

Recent Articles

  • Memorial Day Round-Up: Reverse Mortgage Online Leads to Trump TV?
  • S&P Affirms, Raises Celink Rankings As Reverse Mortgage Servicer
  • Financial Planners to Reverse Mortgage Lenders: Educate Us
  • Zillow: One-Third of U.S. Mortgages Now Underwater
  • Training Reminder: Which Product is Right for the Reverse Mortgage Consumer?
  • Credit Unions See Loan Origination Record, Uptick in Mortgages
  • On Slow Climb, Gallup Finds Economic Confidence Best Since ’08

Popular Posts

  • FHA To Change Up Condo Lending Requirements?
  • First Century Bank Rolls Out Reverse Mortgage Advisor Program
  • Will FHA Make Way for More Private Reverse Mortgages?
  • Reverse Mortgage "Pre" Counseling Serves Some, Not All
  • Financial Planners to Reverse Mortgage Lenders: Educate Us


Our Sites

Long Term Care Daily

Senior Housing News

Home Health Care News


©2012 Reverse Mortgage Daily
Powered by WordPress using the Gridline Lite theme by Graph Paper Press.