Reverse Mortgage Daily

  • Home
  • About
  • Wholesale Lenders
  • Jobs
  • Awards
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Data
  • Content
  • Categories
    • Alternatives
      • EquityKey
      • REX
    • American Advisors Group
    • CFPB
    • Chart of the Day
    • Commentary
    • Counseling
    • Data
    • Events
    • FHA
    • GNMA
    • Gov. Updates
    • International
    • Interview Series
    • Jumbo Products
    • Leads
    • Legislation
    • Lenders
    • Live Well
    • Marketing
    • MBA Reverse
    • Moneyhouse
    • New Category
    • New York Life
    • News
    • NRMLA
    • Podcast
    • Products
      • 1st Reverse
      • Bank of America
      • Countrywide
      • Financial Freedom
      • FNMA Homekeeper
      • Generation Mortgage
      • Gold Reverse
      • Golden Gateway
      • Guardian First
      • HECM
      • JB Nutter
      • Liberty Reverse
      • Live Well Financial
      • LLS
      • MetLife
      • Quicken
      • Reverseit
      • Seattle Mortgage
      • Security One
      • Sun West
      • Virtual Bank
      • Wells Fargo
    • Rates
    • Retirement
    • Reverse Mortgage
    • Reverse Mortgage Jobs
    • Senior Housing
    • Servicers
      • Celink
      • RMS
    • Technology
      • Bay Docs
      • Mortgage Cadence
      • Reverse Vision
    • Top HECM Lenders
    • Training
    • Video
    • Warehouse Lines
  • RSS




« Banking Lobbyists Fight Reverse Mortgage Legislation
Over Half of Seniors Fear Current Net Worth Can’t Sustain Their Retirement »

Ginnie Mae Addresses Reverse Mortgage Capacity Rumors

July 21st, 2009  |  by Guest Published in FHA, GNMA, News, Reverse Mortgage  |  8 Comments

GNMALogo Even as government officials (HUD and the FBI being the latest) continue to issue warnings to seniors about reverse mortgage scams, and some practitioners worry about sudden exits by companies like Senior Lending Network, others see more than a few opportunities in the sector.

Rumors have circulated that Ginnie Mae was limiting their HMBS issuances and withdrawing previous authority to certain issuers while not accepting any new ones, especially in the wake of the SLN developments.

But, speaking on background, one Washington insider tells RMD there is confusion about HMBS funding and that while demand for reverse mortgage funding this year is particularly heavy, government guarantors such as Ginnie Mae will have sufficient budgetary authority to meet it.

A Ginnie Mae spokesperson adds emphatically: “We do not have a limit on the level of HMBS securities we will issue for the year, nor is there a limit on new issuers we will accept.” Total HMBS issuance for FY’08 was $1,159,221,127, she said. Thus far, in this fiscal year (October 2008 – June 2009) that issuance amount already has been higher, at $1,602,761,822.

One private investor active in the space, told RMD: “Ginnie Mae issuance is strong and [execution is] getting stronger,” noting that its increasing vigor “will bring a lot of people into the business.” This person offered an upbeat assessment of secondary market liquidity for reverse mortgages, describing it as having “improved dramatically” as of late and noting that “Wall Street is becoming more interested in securitizing HECM product and [more] lenders are coming in to provide warehouse lines.” This person, whose investment firm will announce a new acquisition shortly, lauded creativity in the secondary markets and “recognition that [reverse mortgages] are a great asset to hold.”

Neil J. Morse has been a communications professional working in the mortgage finance industry for more than a decade, currently specializing in the reverse mortgage sector. He can be reached at nmorse@morsecommunications.com


Sign up to receive free updates like this by email or subscribe by RSS feed. Thanks for reading!

  • Share this:
Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post
    Related Posts
  • Ginnie Mae HMBS Issuance Up 26% in 2010
  • Ginnie Mae Guarantees $871 Million of HMBS in April
  • Ginne Mae Issuance of Reverse Mortgage Securities Holds Steady



  • Anonymous

    Critic,rnrnGood morning. I agree with you 100%. We as an industry need to see a reduction in FNMA’s participation. We are held at bay with FNMA holding the big stick over us. Lets hope we see a marked improvement in the near future.rnrnWe have to remain skeptical based on historical happenings.rnrnJohn A. Smaldone

  • Anonymous

    Critic,rnrnGood morning. I agree with you 100%. We as an industry need to see a reduction in FNMA’s participation. We are held at bay with FNMA holding the big stick over us. Lets hope we see a marked improvement in the near future.rnrnWe have to remain skeptical based on historical happenings.rnrnJohn A. Smaldone

  • Anonymous

    Although skeptical, this is great news. If there is marked improvement in the near future, perhaps this could offset reduced Fannie Mae participation in the future.

  • The_Critic

    Although skeptical, this is great news. If there is marked improvement in the near future, perhaps this could offset reduced Fannie Mae participation in the future.

  • jsmaldone

    Critic,

    Good morning. I agree with you 100%. We as an industry need to see a reduction in FNMA's participation. We are held at bay with FNMA holding the big stick over us. Lets hope we see a marked improvement in the near future.

    We have to remain skeptical based on historical happenings.

    John A. Smaldone

  • jsmaldone

    Critic,

    Good morning. I agree with you 100%. We as an industry need to see a reduction in FNMA's participation. We are held at bay with FNMA holding the big stick over us. Lets hope we see a marked improvement in the near future.

    We have to remain skeptical based on historical happenings.

    John A. Smaldone

  • Anonymous

    Critic,rnrnGood morning. I agree with you 100%. We as an industry need to see a reduction in FNMA’s participation. We are held at bay with FNMA holding the big stick over us. Lets hope we see a marked improvement in the near future.rnrnWe have to remain skeptical based on historical happenings.rnrnJohn A. Smaldone

  • Anonymous

    Critic,rnrnGood morning. I agree with you 100%. We as an industry need to see a reduction in FNMA’s participation. We are held at bay with FNMA holding the big stick over us. Lets hope we see a marked improvement in the near future.rnrnWe have to remain skeptical based on historical happenings.rnrnJohn A. Smaldone

.

Daily news on the reverse mortgage industry delivered to your inbox.



Wholesale Lender Sponsors







Sponsors






Exclusive Training Provider







RSS Reverse Mortgage Jobs

  • Reverse Mortgage Underwriter
  • MetLife Reverse Mortgage Professionals Wanted
  • Reverse Mortgage Consultant
  • Reverse Mortgage Consultant
  • Reverse Originator
  • Loan Officer
  • Reverse Mortgage Originator Virginia
  • Reverse Mortgage Originator Maryland

Recent Articles

  • Memorial Day Round-Up: Reverse Mortgage Online Leads to Trump TV?
  • S&P Affirms, Raises Celink Rankings As Reverse Mortgage Servicer
  • Financial Planners to Reverse Mortgage Lenders: Educate Us
  • Zillow: One-Third of U.S. Mortgages Now Underwater
  • Training Reminder: Which Product is Right for the Reverse Mortgage Consumer?
  • Credit Unions See Loan Origination Record, Uptick in Mortgages
  • On Slow Climb, Gallup Finds Economic Confidence Best Since ’08

Popular Posts

  • FHA To Change Up Condo Lending Requirements?
  • First Century Bank Rolls Out Reverse Mortgage Advisor Program
  • Reverse Mortgage "Pre" Counseling Serves Some, Not All
  • Will FHA Make Way for More Private Reverse Mortgages?
  • Financial Planners to Reverse Mortgage Lenders: Educate Us


Our Sites

Long Term Care Daily

Senior Housing News

Home Health Care News


©2012 Reverse Mortgage Daily
Powered by WordPress using the Gridline Lite theme by Graph Paper Press.