<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inspector General Concerned About Reverse Mortgage Fraud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/06/19/inspector-general-concerned-about-reverse-mortgage-fraud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/06/19/inspector-general-concerned-about-reverse-mortgage-fraud/</link>
	<description>Reverse Mortgage News and Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 06:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joyce Hanson</title>
		<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/06/19/inspector-general-concerned-about-reverse-mortgage-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-32577</link>
		<dc:creator>Joyce Hanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/06/19/inspector-general-concerned-about-reverse-mortgage-fraud/#comment-32577</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately we have the same dishonest loan officers who would steal from their own parents, getting into the reverse mortgage business.  I have been originating reverse mortgages for 13 years and some of the stories I hear from seniors make me sick!! One of the big offenders are the online or telemarketing originators.  The untruths they tell the Senior, just to get the loan is dispicable!! I think all reverse mortgage applications should be done face to face to perhaps eliminate some of this fraud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately we have the same dishonest loan officers who would steal from their own parents, getting into the reverse mortgage business.  I have been originating reverse mortgages for 13 years and some of the stories I hear from seniors make me sick!! One of the big offenders are the online or telemarketing originators.  The untruths they tell the Senior, just to get the loan is dispicable!! I think all reverse mortgage applications should be done face to face to perhaps eliminate some of this fraud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/06/19/inspector-general-concerned-about-reverse-mortgage-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-32557</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/06/19/inspector-general-concerned-about-reverse-mortgage-fraud/#comment-32557</guid>
		<description>Amazing, we just saw a decade of Fannie Mae and other government agency promoting sub-prime lending that filled trillions of dollars of Mortgage Backed Securities, and they are now worried about Reverse Mortgage fraud? Sounds like the the imates are running the crazy house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing, we just saw a decade of Fannie Mae and other government agency promoting sub-prime lending that filled trillions of dollars of Mortgage Backed Securities, and they are now worried about Reverse Mortgage fraud? Sounds like the the imates are running the crazy house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reporter21</title>
		<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/06/19/inspector-general-concerned-about-reverse-mortgage-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-32499</link>
		<dc:creator>reporter21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 19:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/06/19/inspector-general-concerned-about-reverse-mortgage-fraud/#comment-32499</guid>
		<description>The schemes are the same that you could have on cash-out forwards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The schemes are the same that you could have on cash-out forwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dduck</title>
		<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/06/19/inspector-general-concerned-about-reverse-mortgage-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-32436</link>
		<dc:creator>dduck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 21:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/06/19/inspector-general-concerned-about-reverse-mortgage-fraud/#comment-32436</guid>
		<description>Like any tool, an annuity can be used improperly, just as not everyone should use an RM. 
**First of all an immediate annuity (IA)(fixed or variable) could be inappropriate if the annuitant(s) need more than the monthly payments or are afraid of insufficient funds for a long-term care situation, etc. (or, need  I state it,  money for the kids or grandkids). Also, last time I checked, the tenure provision would provide a HIGHER monthly payout. And, from a cash flow standpoint, tax brackets need to be checked as a portion of IA payments are taxable. (Of course, the IA has lifetime payout options and may continue paying in some situations where tenure would have stopped.)
**A deferred annuity (TDA), likewise, could &quot;tie up&quot; money as stated above. (Usually the liquidity is 10% per year, non-cumulative, with full access in about seven years.) Usually, this is appropriate for &quot;extra money&quot; where no long-term need is anticipated for the premium amount invested
**A rated IA (meaning medical underwriting) could be more appropriate in some instances, when health is an issue, and could beat tenure.
** A Reversionary Annuity (RA) is not available in all states and is used only in specific circumstances.
--Annuities are wonderful tools, just like RMs, when used properly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like any tool, an annuity can be used improperly, just as not everyone should use an RM.<br />
**First of all an immediate annuity (IA)(fixed or variable) could be inappropriate if the annuitant(s) need more than the monthly payments or are afraid of insufficient funds for a long-term care situation, etc. (or, need  I state it,  money for the kids or grandkids). Also, last time I checked, the tenure provision would provide a HIGHER monthly payout. And, from a cash flow standpoint, tax brackets need to be checked as a portion of IA payments are taxable. (Of course, the IA has lifetime payout options and may continue paying in some situations where tenure would have stopped.)<br />
**A deferred annuity (TDA), likewise, could &#8220;tie up&#8221; money as stated above. (Usually the liquidity is 10% per year, non-cumulative, with full access in about seven years.) Usually, this is appropriate for &#8220;extra money&#8221; where no long-term need is anticipated for the premium amount invested<br />
**A rated IA (meaning medical underwriting) could be more appropriate in some instances, when health is an issue, and could beat tenure.<br />
** A Reversionary Annuity (RA) is not available in all states and is used only in specific circumstances.<br />
&#8211;Annuities are wonderful tools, just like RMs, when used properly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wehavegonemad</title>
		<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/06/19/inspector-general-concerned-about-reverse-mortgage-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-32414</link>
		<dc:creator>wehavegonemad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 16:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/06/19/inspector-general-concerned-about-reverse-mortgage-fraud/#comment-32414</guid>
		<description>Can anyone explain to me how you invest in an annuity in an improper way? That seems like a blanket statement with very little meat to the explanation.

Yes, I can understand keeping seniors out of variable annuities due to market risk, but the equity indexed or fixed products with good solid companies don&#039;t do any of the things these people claim.

It is my belief and the proof is in their words, that the feds make &#039;chicken little&#039; statements these day to get the public to allow them to increase their regulatory power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone explain to me how you invest in an annuity in an improper way? That seems like a blanket statement with very little meat to the explanation.</p>
<p>Yes, I can understand keeping seniors out of variable annuities due to market risk, but the equity indexed or fixed products with good solid companies don&#8217;t do any of the things these people claim.</p>
<p>It is my belief and the proof is in their words, that the feds make &#8216;chicken little&#8217; statements these day to get the public to allow them to increase their regulatory power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 21/28 queries in 0.055 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Rackspace Cloud Files: c311757.r57.cf1.rackcdn.com

Served from: reversemortgagedaily.com @ 2012-05-26 03:51:33 -->
