<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tax Consequences Resulting from Foreclosure on a Reverse Mortgage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/06/12/tax-consequences-resulting-from-foreclosure-on-a-reverse-mortgage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/06/12/tax-consequences-resulting-from-foreclosure-on-a-reverse-mortgage/</link>
	<description>Reverse Mortgage News and Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:18:30 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John B</title>
		<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/06/12/tax-consequences-resulting-from-foreclosure-on-a-reverse-mortgage/comment-page-1/#comment-32627</link>
		<dc:creator>John B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/06/12/tax-consequences-resulting-from-foreclosure-on-a-reverse-mortgage/#comment-32627</guid>
		<description>Still have a question? &lt;br&gt;When the home is no longer lived in with a reverse mortgage and is sold within the time period for present market value, are there still tax concerns on the forgiven debt?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still have a question? <br />When the home is no longer lived in with a reverse mortgage and is sold within the time period for present market value, are there still tax concerns on the forgiven debt?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James E. Veale, CPA, MBT</title>
		<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/06/12/tax-consequences-resulting-from-foreclosure-on-a-reverse-mortgage/comment-page-1/#comment-32171</link>
		<dc:creator>James E. Veale, CPA, MBT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/06/12/tax-consequences-resulting-from-foreclosure-on-a-reverse-mortgage/#comment-32171</guid>
		<description>Ms. Hazzard,

You provide interesting financial information but leave out critical information such as what type of loan each of these mortgages are, recourse or nonrecourse.  You also leave out the state in which the condo is located.  Beyond that one may need to know the adjusted income tax basis in the home.

Rather than attempting to answer your question on this website, it is much better if you seek the advice of a competent and knowledgeable attorney with experience in these matters.  Your suggestion could take a non-recourse loan and make it recourse.  While I do not mean to imply that such action may not be appropriate if short sale or foreclosure could harm your chances for another loan in a period when you need one, I do mean to imply you should explore your options before making any decision.
  
Please do not place your tax concerns before your legal liability and financial viability concerns.  In the tax world we call that “allowing the tail to wag the dog.”  Tax concerns are important but other concerns should normally come first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ms. Hazzard,</p>
<p>You provide interesting financial information but leave out critical information such as what type of loan each of these mortgages are, recourse or nonrecourse.  You also leave out the state in which the condo is located.  Beyond that one may need to know the adjusted income tax basis in the home.</p>
<p>Rather than attempting to answer your question on this website, it is much better if you seek the advice of a competent and knowledgeable attorney with experience in these matters.  Your suggestion could take a non-recourse loan and make it recourse.  While I do not mean to imply that such action may not be appropriate if short sale or foreclosure could harm your chances for another loan in a period when you need one, I do mean to imply you should explore your options before making any decision.</p>
<p>Please do not place your tax concerns before your legal liability and financial viability concerns.  In the tax world we call that “allowing the tail to wag the dog.”  Tax concerns are important but other concerns should normally come first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rosiehazzard</title>
		<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/06/12/tax-consequences-resulting-from-foreclosure-on-a-reverse-mortgage/comment-page-1/#comment-32144</link>
		<dc:creator>rosiehazzard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/06/12/tax-consequences-resulting-from-foreclosure-on-a-reverse-mortgage/#comment-32144</guid>
		<description>I own a condo and have an outstanding balance of $140k, consisting of $104k primary and $36k secondary. I took the home equity to consolidate debts. At the time the property was valued at $163k but now it is valued at $134k. I&#039;m looking to sell because i am engaged and will be moving into my fiancee&#039;s home. Check http://obamamortgage2009.blogspot.com/2009/03/obamas-mortgage-modification-do-you.html If I have a buyer who offers me within say $5-7k of the outstanding, can i agree to assume a loan on the residual and pay the bank the difference over time with interest? The same bank holds both mortgages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own a condo and have an outstanding balance of $140k, consisting of $104k primary and $36k secondary. I took the home equity to consolidate debts. At the time the property was valued at $163k but now it is valued at $134k. I&#8217;m looking to sell because i am engaged and will be moving into my fiancee&#8217;s home. Check <a href="http://obamamortgage2009.blogspot.com/2009/03/obamas-mortgage-modification-do-you.html" rel="nofollow">http://obamamortgage2009.blogspot.com/2009/03/obamas-mortgage-modification-do-you.html</a> If I have a buyer who offers me within say $5-7k of the outstanding, can i agree to assume a loan on the residual and pay the bank the difference over time with interest? The same bank holds both mortgages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James E. Veale, CPA, MBT</title>
		<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/06/12/tax-consequences-resulting-from-foreclosure-on-a-reverse-mortgage/comment-page-1/#comment-32083</link>
		<dc:creator>James E. Veale, CPA, MBT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/06/12/tax-consequences-resulting-from-foreclosure-on-a-reverse-mortgage/#comment-32083</guid>
		<description>Mr. John P.,

That is the subject of an article soon to be published by RMD; it has been written and submitted.  It should appear shortly.

In brief, heirs can have income tax consequences as to a foreclosed home received from through will, trust, etc.  With some tax planning, some or all of the resulting income tax liability can be avoided.  However, the artilc will cover these points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. John P.,</p>
<p>That is the subject of an article soon to be published by RMD; it has been written and submitted.  It should appear shortly.</p>
<p>In brief, heirs can have income tax consequences as to a foreclosed home received from through will, trust, etc.  With some tax planning, some or all of the resulting income tax liability can be avoided.  However, the artilc will cover these points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John P</title>
		<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/06/12/tax-consequences-resulting-from-foreclosure-on-a-reverse-mortgage/comment-page-1/#comment-32080</link>
		<dc:creator>John P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2009/06/12/tax-consequences-resulting-from-foreclosure-on-a-reverse-mortgage/#comment-32080</guid>
		<description>Mr. Veale,

Thank you for the added clarification!  

In regards to the question of timeframe, HUD provides guidelines that dictate a &quot;grace period&quot; for repayment of a loan after a maturity event has occured.  The initial grace period is 6 months long and can be extended in 3 month intervals for a maximum of a 12 month grace period after the maturity event occured.  After the 12 month period, lenders will iniate foreclosure actions/proceedings to recover the debt.

From your initial article, would you be able to comment as to whether or not the estate/heir would have tax liablility in an instance where the 12 month grace period has expired, the lender foreclosed, and the lender received less than the original HECM debt balance?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Veale,</p>
<p>Thank you for the added clarification!  </p>
<p>In regards to the question of timeframe, HUD provides guidelines that dictate a &#8220;grace period&#8221; for repayment of a loan after a maturity event has occured.  The initial grace period is 6 months long and can be extended in 3 month intervals for a maximum of a 12 month grace period after the maturity event occured.  After the 12 month period, lenders will iniate foreclosure actions/proceedings to recover the debt.</p>
<p>From your initial article, would you be able to comment as to whether or not the estate/heir would have tax liablility in an instance where the 12 month grace period has expired, the lender foreclosed, and the lender received less than the original HECM debt balance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
