Reverse Mortgage Daily

  • Home
  • About
  • Wholesale Lenders
  • Jobs
  • Awards
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Data
  • Content
  • Categories
    • Alternatives
      • EquityKey
      • REX
    • American Advisors Group
    • CFPB
    • Chart of the Day
    • Commentary
    • Counseling
    • Data
    • Events
    • FHA
    • GNMA
    • Gov. Updates
    • International
    • Interview Series
    • Jumbo Products
    • Leads
    • Legislation
    • Lenders
    • Live Well
    • Marketing
    • MBA Reverse
    • Moneyhouse
    • New Category
    • New York Life
    • News
    • NRMLA
    • Podcast
    • Products
      • 1st Reverse
      • Bank of America
      • Countrywide
      • Financial Freedom
      • FNMA Homekeeper
      • Generation Mortgage
      • Gold Reverse
      • Golden Gateway
      • Guardian First
      • HECM
      • JB Nutter
      • Liberty Reverse
      • Live Well Financial
      • LLS
      • MetLife
      • Quicken
      • Reverseit
      • Seattle Mortgage
      • Security One
      • Sun West
      • Virtual Bank
      • Wells Fargo
    • Rates
    • Retirement
    • Reverse Mortgage
    • Reverse Mortgage Jobs
    • Senior Housing
    • Servicers
      • Celink
      • RMS
    • Technology
      • Bay Docs
      • Mortgage Cadence
      • Reverse Vision
    • Top HECM Lenders
    • Training
    • Video
    • Warehouse Lines
  • RSS




« FTC Alert: Identifying False and Misleading Claims Related to Reverse Mortgages
Sponsored Reverse Mortgage Podcast: Taxes, FTC, NRMLA and More »

Tax Consequences Resulting from Foreclosure on a Reverse Mortgage

June 12th, 2009  |  by Jim Veale Published in Commentary, News, Reverse Mortgage  |  19 Comments

One of the most perplexing aspects of the Home Equity Conversion Mortgages (HECMs) is the income tax consequences of forgiving (or canceling) any portion of the balance due through short sale, foreclosure, trustee’s sale, or deed in lieu of foreclosure. (This article does not address the income tax consequences of abandonments.)  The complexity stems from the nonrecourse nature of reverse mortgages and the promise that no deficiency judgment can be obtained against the mortgagor or heirs. However, the “no liability” promise does not extend to income tax consequences to borrowers or successor owners of the property who receive their ownership as the direct result of the death of the borrower.

Unless otherwise noted, the word “foreclosure” as used in this article includes short sales, trustee’s sales, deeds in lieu of foreclosure, foreclosures, and all other similar forms of transfers of homes (except abandonments) where at time of transfer the amount due on a HECM is greater than the value of the home (net of all liens having a higher priority above the HECM).

HECM Proceeds Can Be Taxable

Reverse mortgage proceeds can become taxable if any portion is forgiven by the lender. If nonrecourse debt is forgiven in a transaction other than sale such as loan modification, it will generally have the same tax ramifications as the forgiveness of recourse debt which is taxable as ordinary income under Section (§) 61(a)(12) of the 1986 Internal Revenue Code as Amended (IRC). A portion or all of the resulting income may be excludible under IRC § 108.

Foreclosure is considered a sale of the underlying property for income tax purposes. Under IRC Regulation § 1.1001-2, the sales price of the property is the sum of nonrecourse debt forgiven plus the fair market value of the property at the time of foreclosure.

Some theoreticians argue that HECM proceeds are not taxable in foreclosure as long as the total of the accrued but unpaid 1) monthly servicing fees, 2) FHA insurance fees charged on the outstanding balance (not upfront fees since they reduce available proceeds), and 3) interest exceeds the amount forgiven. There is no such argument when the amount forgiven exceeds that total.

A few taxpayers claim to have successfully argued in IRS audit that since FHA insurance proceeds were used to pay the shortfall and they paid for the policy with after-tax dollars, FHA insurance proceeds are nontaxable and the payoff falls outside of the foreclosure provisions. They refer to the income taxation of proceeds from life insurance policies in the event of death, medical insurance, and property casualty insurance. Since all of these situations are excludible by specific tax provisions, the argument has little substance and no legal precedence. As will be seen if these loans were HECMs, the audit “winners” might have been overall tax losers.

Illustrations

For example, assume a mortgagor owes $350,000 on a HECM but the appraised value of the home is only $250,000 when the mortgagor surrenders the deed in lieu of foreclosure in 2009. The mortgagor purchased the home in 1974 for $55,000 and spent $50,000 in renovations; however, the mortgagor deferred gains from prior sales of $37,000 — under former § 1034 of the IRC — for an adjusted tax basis of $68,000 (i.e., $55,000 + $50,000 – $37,000). This has been and continues to be his sole and principal residence since 1974. For tax purposes the sales price from foreclosure would be $350,000 [i.e., $250,000 (appraised value) plus the $100,000 from the nonrecourse debt forgiven]. The tax gain would be $282,000 (i.e., $350,000 – $68,000).

Determining gain is not the end of the story. Other income tax provisions may apply. By way of illustration, if the mortgagor in the example is single and meets all of the exclusion rules under the exclusion of gain on the sale of a principal residence provision of IRC § 121, he could exclude $250,000 of the gain leaving only $32,000 to be recognized as a long-term capital gain.

If instead the mortgagor had bought the house for $370,000 in 2005, had done no improvements, and had no prior gains deferred under IRC former § 1034, the adjusted basis of the home would be $370,000. The foreclosure loss would be $20,000 (i.e., $350,000 – $370,000) and as a loss from the sale of a principal residence is a non-deductible personal loss which cannot offset taxable gains or be deducted in any way.

So as can be seen, the amount forgiven on a HECM is no indication of the amount of gain or loss to be recognized upon foreclosure. This is unlike the ordinary income rules governing forgiveness of debt on 1) all recourse loans and 2) those nonrecourse loans where the underlying property is not transferred (such as loan modification); these rules are not presented in this article.

A Benefit from the Tax Foreclosure Computation

To the extent that accrued but unpaid interest is reflected in the sales price in computing the foreclosure gain or loss, such interest is treated as paid. Generally, only paid interest can be used in computing deductible home mortgage interest for itemized deduction purposes. Computing the deductible portion of paid home mortgage interest is a subject for a different article and, therefore, is deferred.

Using the examples above, imagine that of the $100,000 forgiven, $94,000 is accrued but unpaid interest. The total accrued but unpaid interest is $110,000. After working through all of the home mortgage interest rules, $70,000 turns out to be deductible. (For purposes of this example, it is assumed that none of the accrued but unpaid MIP would be deductible.) In the first case, the recognizable gain is $32,000 but the deductible interest exceeds that amount. Long-term capital gains are taxed at a preferential income tax rate while itemized deductions are deductible first against ordinary income which is generally taxed at higher rates. As to the second, although the tax loss from foreclosure is not deductible, the interest is. Unfortunately (or maybe fortunately) not all seniors (or heirs) have the income to effectively utilize this deduction in one tax year. That is why tax planning is highly recommended for HECM and proprietary reverse mortgage borrowers.

Conclusion and Advice Disclaimer

While reverse mortgage proceeds may not always be non-taxable, the story does not always have a bad ending. Advising clients to see their tax advisor may easily earn originators the gratitude of the borrower, heirs, and, of course, the tax advisor. To cover this subject adequately, other topics should be addressed including compliance, foreclosure following the death of the borrower, and how borrowers can help heirs avoid the tax consequences of foreclosure.

James E. Veale, CPA, MBT is the SVP of Tax and Government Affairs & Director of Originator Recruiting for Security One Lending

The purpose of this article was to make readers aware of income tax consequences related to HECM liabilities forgiven in a taxable transfer of a home securing the HECM. The IRS requires that readers be advised that this article cannot be relied upon to mitigate tax penalties. Short sales, abandonments, foreclosures, trustee’s sales, or deeds in lieu of foreclosure are potentially complex income tax transactions and homeowners involved in such transactions should seek the advice of tax professionals who are competent, knowledgeable, and experienced in such matters.

Technorati Tags: Reverse Mortgage,News,HECM,FHA,HUD,Tax,Foreclosure

Sign up to receive free updates like this by email or subscribe by RSS feed. Thanks for reading!

  • Share this:
Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post
    Related Posts
  • Tax Consequences Resulting from Foreclosure on a Reverse Mortgage (Part 2)
  • IRS Corrects Reverse Mortgage Misinformation
  • HUD Publishes New Reverse Mortgage Servicing FAQ



  • Anonymous

    This whole stimulus package is just part of the governments long term plan to take away the power of the people. Are we going to do something about it or be lazy and think someone else is going to do it for us? It is time for a revolution. We need to overthrow the government and take our power back. Before there is nothing we can do about it. you should check http://obamamortgage2009.blogspot.com/2009/03/obamas-ortgage-modification-do-you.html#comments

  • Anonymous

    Still have a question? rnWhen the home is no longer lived in with a reverse mortgage and is sold within the time period for present market value, are there still tax concerns on the forgiven debt?

  • Anonymous

    This whole stimulus package is just part of the governments long term plan to take away the power of the people. Are we going to do something about it or be lazy and think someone else is going to do it for us? It is time for a revolution. We need to overthrow the government and take our power back. Before there is nothing we can do about it. you should check http://obamamortgage2009.blogspot.com/2009/03/obamas-ortgage-modification-do-you.html#comments

  • Anonymous

    Still have a question? rnWhen the home is no longer lived in with a reverse mortgage and is sold within the time period for present market value, are there still tax concerns on the forgiven debt?

  • dduck

    It seems to me, a non tax expert, that the government, has it both ways. Correct me if I’m wrong, but don’t they call the MIP “insurance”, with “premiums”, and yet they exclude the proceeds even if the lender dies (this would be life contingent) or does not die(some kind of casualty insurance) and at the same time has no actuarial basis for premiums or a real reserve fund(all lenders pay the same Premium) and they have the nerve to think about raising this “premium” rate.

  • Dawn

    Allowing the HECM loan to be foreclosed on seems to be the problem.

    2 possible solutions:

    a) return property with the intention to terminate residence and invoke the nonrecourse rule, or

    b) file bankruptcy concurrently with the foreclosure, which I believe provides an exception to the phantom gain provisions of the IRS.

    If the HECM borrower has refinanced previously and has phantom gain from previous loans – I defer to Mr. Veale.

  • Louise

    I’ve heard that neither solution would work. I don’t know if there is anything that would. Any other solutions out there?

  • http://obamamortgage2009.blogspot.com veronicabenn

    This whole stimulus package is just part of the governments long term plan to take away the power of the people. Are we going to do something about it or be lazy and think someone else is going to do it for us? It is time for a revolution. We need to overthrow the government and take our power back. Before there is nothing we can do about it. you should check http://obamamortgage2009.blogspot.com/2009/03/obamas-mortgage-modification-do-you.html#comments

  • James E. Veale, CPA, MBT

    Dawn,

    I fully encourage anyone facing foreclosure to seek the advice of a practicing lawyer who is competent, knowledgeable, and experienced in foreclosure matters. For the purpose of this comment, it is assumed that the security for the reverse mortgage is the principal residence of the borrower (which may not always be the case, particularly with some existing proprietary reverse mortgages); it is also assumed for the purpose of this comment that all reverse mortgages are non-recourse.

    There really is no such thing as “returning” a home to the lender on a reverse mortgage unless the lender owned the home and sold it to the borrower as part of the reverse mortgage. Surrendering a deed in lieu of foreclosure is very appropriate for many reverse mortgage borrowers facing foreclosure; however, there is no income tax difference between foreclosure and surrendering the deed in lieu of foreclosure where non-recourse debt is involved. That is why as used in the article, “foreclosure” included surrendering a deed in lieu of foreclosure; I apologize if that was not clear in the article.

    Rarely will bankruptcy be a viable or reasonable option if the only debt in question is a reverse mortgage. Bankruptcy does not lessen the taxable gain resulting from foreclosure on a non-recourse mortgage related to a principal residence. The exclusion for income resulting from debt cancelled in bankruptcy is found in IRC § 108 which only applies to ordinary income resulting from cancelation of debt under IRC § 61(a)(12). Since IRC Regulation § 1.1002-2 specifically excludes any non-recourse debt cancelled from inclusion under IRC § 61(a)(12), bankruptcy will not provide any protection from the income tax consequences of gain that results from any portion of the balance due on a reverse mortgage that is cancelled related to a transfer in the title of the underlying home through foreclosure, deed in lieu of foreclosure, short sale, a sale under a trustee’s power to sell, etc. (whether occurring in bankruptcy or not).

    Finally, there are no income tax exclusions for “phantom gain” or phantom income through bankruptcy. Many refer to some of the ordinary income includible under IRC § 61(a)(12) as phantom income but there is no provision that specifically excludes phantom income due to bankruptcy.

    Bankruptcy can result in lowered or cancelled income tax liabilities as part of the reduced liabilities to creditors but only after they have been determined. Such discussions are beyond the scope of this comment (and the article).

  • John P

    Mr. Veale,

    I’m curious to know if you could provide additional details regarding:

    “If nonrecourse debt is forgiven in a transaction other than sale such as loan modification, it will generally have the same tax ramifications as the forgiveness of recourse debt which is taxable as ordinary income…”

    The statement appears to be indicating that the exception to the tax issue at hand is through the sale of the subject property within the allowable timeframe, is that correct?

  • James E. Veale, CPA, MBT

    Mr. John P.,

    The general rule is that cancellation of debt results in ordinary income under IRC § 61(a)(12) some or all of which may be excludible under IRC § 108. The biggest exception to that rule is cancellation of debt where the underlying security is sold as explained in the article.

    What throws me off a little is the phrase “within the allowable timeframe” near the end of your question. What timeframe is that?

  • James E. Veale, CPA, MBT

    CORRECTION

    This is a correction to the comment at 12:15 am on June 16th above.

    Mr. John P.,

    In my comment referenced above I left out the word “non-recourse” from the second sentence of the first paragraph. Also the word “sold” in that sentence should be “trnsferred.” That sentence should now read as follows:

    The biggest exception to that rule is cancellation of non-recourse debt where the underlying security is transferred as explained in the article.

    I apologize for any confusion.

  • John P

    Mr. Veale,

    Thank you for the added clarification!

    In regards to the question of timeframe, HUD provides guidelines that dictate a “grace period” for repayment of a loan after a maturity event has occured. The initial grace period is 6 months long and can be extended in 3 month intervals for a maximum of a 12 month grace period after the maturity event occured. After the 12 month period, lenders will iniate foreclosure actions/proceedings to recover the debt.

    From your initial article, would you be able to comment as to whether or not the estate/heir would have tax liablility in an instance where the 12 month grace period has expired, the lender foreclosed, and the lender received less than the original HECM debt balance?

  • James E. Veale, CPA, MBT

    Mr. John P.,

    That is the subject of an article soon to be published by RMD; it has been written and submitted. It should appear shortly.

    In brief, heirs can have income tax consequences as to a foreclosed home received from through will, trust, etc. With some tax planning, some or all of the resulting income tax liability can be avoided. However, the artilc will cover these points.

  • http://obamamortgage2009.blogspot.com/ rosiehazzard

    I own a condo and have an outstanding balance of $140k, consisting of $104k primary and $36k secondary. I took the home equity to consolidate debts. At the time the property was valued at $163k but now it is valued at $134k. I’m looking to sell because i am engaged and will be moving into my fiancee’s home. Check http://obamamortgage2009.blogspot.com/2009/03/obamas-mortgage-modification-do-you.html If I have a buyer who offers me within say $5-7k of the outstanding, can i agree to assume a loan on the residual and pay the bank the difference over time with interest? The same bank holds both mortgages.

  • James E. Veale, CPA, MBT

    Ms. Hazzard,

    You provide interesting financial information but leave out critical information such as what type of loan each of these mortgages are, recourse or nonrecourse. You also leave out the state in which the condo is located. Beyond that one may need to know the adjusted income tax basis in the home.

    Rather than attempting to answer your question on this website, it is much better if you seek the advice of a competent and knowledgeable attorney with experience in these matters. Your suggestion could take a non-recourse loan and make it recourse. While I do not mean to imply that such action may not be appropriate if short sale or foreclosure could harm your chances for another loan in a period when you need one, I do mean to imply you should explore your options before making any decision.

    Please do not place your tax concerns before your legal liability and financial viability concerns. In the tax world we call that “allowing the tail to wag the dog.” Tax concerns are important but other concerns should normally come first.

  • John B

    Still have a question?
    When the home is no longer lived in with a reverse mortgage and is sold within the time period for present market value, are there still tax concerns on the forgiven debt?

  • John B

    Still have a question? rnWhen the home is no longer lived in with a reverse mortgage and is sold within the time period for present market value, are there still tax concerns on the forgiven debt?

  • http://obamamortgage2009.blogspot.com/ Alanmulvey

    This whole stimulus package is just part of the governments long term plan to take away the power of the people. Are we going to do something about it or be lazy and think someone else is going to do it for us? It is time for a revolution. We need to overthrow the government and take our power back. Before there is nothing we can do about it. you should check http://obamamortgage2009.blogspot.com/2009/03/obamas-ortgage-modification-do-you.html#comments

.

Daily news on the reverse mortgage industry delivered to your inbox.



Wholesale Lender Sponsors







Sponsors






Exclusive Training Provider







RSS Reverse Mortgage Jobs

  • Reverse Mortgage Underwriter
  • MetLife Reverse Mortgage Professionals Wanted
  • Reverse Mortgage Consultant
  • Reverse Mortgage Consultant
  • Reverse Originator
  • Loan Officer
  • Reverse Mortgage Originator Virginia
  • Reverse Mortgage Originator Maryland

Recent Articles

  • Memorial Day Round-Up: Reverse Mortgage Online Leads to Trump TV?
  • S&P Affirms, Raises Celink Rankings As Reverse Mortgage Servicer
  • Financial Planners to Reverse Mortgage Lenders: Educate Us
  • Zillow: One-Third of U.S. Mortgages Now Underwater
  • Training Reminder: Which Product is Right for the Reverse Mortgage Consumer?
  • Credit Unions See Loan Origination Record, Uptick in Mortgages
  • On Slow Climb, Gallup Finds Economic Confidence Best Since ’08

Popular Posts

  • FHA To Change Up Condo Lending Requirements?
  • First Century Bank Rolls Out Reverse Mortgage Advisor Program
  • Reverse Mortgage "Pre" Counseling Serves Some, Not All
  • Will FHA Make Way for More Private Reverse Mortgages?
  • Financial Planners to Reverse Mortgage Lenders: Educate Us


Our Sites

Long Term Care Daily

Senior Housing News

Home Health Care News


©2012 Reverse Mortgage Daily
Powered by WordPress using the Gridline Lite theme by Graph Paper Press.