<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Competition Coming to The Reverse Mortgage Industry</title>
	<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2006/12/27/more-competition-coming-to-the-reverse-mortgage-industry/</link>
	<description>Reverse Mortgage News and Information</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reverse Mortgage Daily</title>
		<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2006/12/27/more-competition-coming-to-the-reverse-mortgage-industry/#comment-593</link>
		<dc:creator>Reverse Mortgage Daily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 22:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2006/12/27/more-competition-coming-to-the-reverse-mortgage-industry/#comment-593</guid>
		<description>Valerie,

I agree the article lacked in certain areas and I felt the WSJ didnt do much to point out the benefits the product offers people.  

Thanks for reading!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Valerie,</p>
<p>I agree the article lacked in certain areas and I felt the WSJ didnt do much to point out the benefits the product offers people.  </p>
<p>Thanks for reading!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valerie VanBooven</title>
		<link>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2006/12/27/more-competition-coming-to-the-reverse-mortgage-industry/#comment-592</link>
		<dc:creator>Valerie VanBooven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 18:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://reversemortgagedaily.com/2006/12/27/more-competition-coming-to-the-reverse-mortgage-industry/#comment-592</guid>
		<description>Many of us who work in the industry have read the WSJ article you are referring to. It is full of inaccuracies and leaves out important information. Although I do agree that competition in the marketplace is a great thing, this article is uneducated, under-investigated, and not a good example of a piece that we would consider worthy of praise by far.
Thanks,
Valerie VanBooven
www.theltcexpert.com
www.seniorserviceselling.com- BLOG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many of us who work in the industry have read the WSJ article you are referring to. It is full of inaccuracies and leaves out important information. Although I do agree that competition in the marketplace is a great thing, this article is uneducated, under-investigated, and not a good example of a piece that we would consider worthy of praise by far.<br />
Thanks,<br />
Valerie VanBooven<br />
<a href="http://www.theltcexpert.com" rel="nofollow">www.theltcexpert.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.seniorserviceselling.com-" rel="nofollow">www.seniorserviceselling.com-</a> BLOG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 2.849 seconds -->
